The Evolution Of Institutional Economics
By Geoffrey M. Hodgson. 2004
327 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3aa883e77d54f321d77d625e167a294f4e400627
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- A. Rodríguez‐Pose
- M. Storper
- A. Pike
- Michaela Trippl
- A. Cumbers
- D. Mackinnon
- Henry S. C. Yeung
- David Dequech
Citations in the corpus
- Do different institutional frameworks condition the influence of local fear of failure and entrepreneurial examples over entrepreneurial activity? (2007, background): “Exhaustive literature reviews on the topic of institutional factors that condition new business formation can be found in Rutherford (2001), Hodgson (2004) as well as 316 YANCY VAILLANT AND ESTEBAN LAFUENTE in Wood and Valler (2004).”
- Evolution in Economic Geography: Institutions, Political Economy, and Adaptation (2009, background): “…seemingly reminiscent of the sociological concept of structuration (see Giddens 1984), this formulation is distinguished by its adoption of a stratified ontology and its avoidance of the central conflation of structure and agency that characterizes structuration theory (Archer 1995; Hodgson 2004).”
- Human Capital Theory (2014, background): “It places the individual at the center and emphasizes the human agent over social structures (Hodgson, 2004).”
- Better Rules or Stronger Communities? On the Social Foundations of Institutional Change and Its Economic Effects (2006, background): “Thorstein Veblen and other precursors of evolutionary thinking in economics gave us the basic notion that an economy’s institutions would allow the economy (if successful) to select itself in an ongoing way into the things it could do well and hence to sustain the development process over time (Hodg”
- Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics (2007, background): “…difficulty of actually practicing such an extreme form of methodological individualism when doing economics: some institutions must be taken as given and temporally previous to the present generations of individuals, instead of explained by the behavior of these individuals (Hodgson, 2004, ch. 2).”