Reporting guideline for the early stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI
By B. Vasey, M. Nagendran, Bruce Campbell, David A. Clifton, Gary S. Collins, Spiros C. Denaxas, A. Denniston, L. Faes, B. Geerts, Mudathir Ibrahim and 13 more. British medical journal, 2022
554 citations recorded by the source corpus.
A growing number of artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support systems are showing promising performance in preclinical, in silico, evaluation, but few have yet demonstrated real benefit to patient care. Early stage clinical evaluation is important to assess an AI system’s actual clinical performance at small scale, ensure its safety, evaluate the human factors surrounding its use, and pave the way to further large scale trials. However, the reporting of these early studies remains inadequate. The present statement provides a multistakeholder, consensus-based reporting guideline for the Developmental and Exploratory Clinical Investigations of DEcision support systems driven by Artificial Intelligence (DECIDE-AI). We conducted a two round, modified Delphi process to collect and analyse expert opinion on the reporting of early clinical evaluation of AI systems. Experts were recruited from 20 predefined stakeholder categories. The final composition and wording of the guideline was determined at a virtual consensus meeting. The checklist and the Explanation & Elaboration (E&E) sections were refined based on feedback from a qualitative evaluation process. 123 experts participated in the first round of Delphi, 138 in the second, 16 in the consensus meeting, and 16 in the qualitative evaluation. The DECIDE-AI reporting guideline comprises 17 AI specific reporting items (made of 28 subitems) and 10 generic reporting items, with an E&E paragraph provided for each. Through consultation and consensus with a range of stakeholders, we have developed a guideline comprising key items that should be reported in early stage clinical studies of AI-based decision support systems in healthcare. By providing an actionable checklist of minimal reporting items, the DECIDE-AI guideline will facilitate the appraisal of these studies and replicability of their findings.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Health Informatics, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a8c344f67d5081ead5f7dd5ebf0f760d69fc01d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Chiwei Ong
- Milan Toma
- Jonathan Mayer
- M. Bekbolatova
Citations in the corpus
- FUTURE-AI: international consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare (2023, unknown): “Compared with chat assistants and synthetic image generators that receive increased public interaction, healthcare is a more sensitive domain where errors can have major consequences.”
- Transformative Potential of AI in Healthcare: Definitions, Applications, and Navigating the Ethical Landscape and Public Perspectives (2024, background): “(d) Diagnosis and Clinical Decision Making: AI algorithms significantly contribute to the diagnosis of various diseases, including cancer [33], and play a crucial role in clinical decision-making [34].”