Situating private equity capital in the land grab debate

By Shepard Daniel. 2012

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a85e57ea0b21f3bbe2168a439f2c4e615556805

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Madeleine Fairbairn
2. S. Isakson

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. I. Scoones
2. Saturnino M. Borras Jr.
3. S. Isakson
4. R. Hall
5. Wendy Wolford
6. B. White
7. Madeleine Fairbairn
8. P. Peters

In Soil Science

1. I. Scoones
2. Wendy Wolford
3. R. Hall
4. B. White
5. Saturnino M. Borras Jr.
6. Madeleine Fairbairn
7. S. Isakson
8. P. Peters

Citations in the corpus

• The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals (2012, background): “Shepard Daniel ( 2012 , this volume) addresses a largely unresearched issue, the international financing of land deals, providing a detailed analysis of the involvement of private equity funds in land deals.”
• ‘Like gold with yield’: evolving intersections between farmland and finance (2014, methodology): “Investors now encounter a wide range of options for making private equity investments in global farmland, from NCH Capital’s Agribusiness Partners Fund, which boasts 700,000 ha of farmland in the former Soviet Union and Baltic States (Bergdolt and Mittal 2012), to Emergent Asset Management’s African”
• Food and finance: the financial transformation of agro-food supply chains (2014, background): “Meanwhile, there has been a rush to analyze the land rush, yet only a handful of scholars (e.g. Cotula 2012, Daniel 2012, Fairbairn 2014) have focused upon the role of financial actors in land deals and none appears to consider whether the outcomes of transactions involving financial actors/motives…”