Fast phase unwrapping algorithm for interferometric applications.

By M. Schofield, Yimei Zhu. Optics Letters, 2003

453 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) as a means to measure brain iron? A post mortem validation study (2012, unknown): “Aliasing of the GRE phase was resolved with a Fourier-domain unwrapping technique (Li et al., 2011; Schofield and Zhu, 2003; Schweser et al., in press-a) and background phase contributions were eliminated with the SHARP technique (radius 5 mm, regularization parameter 0.05).”
Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping (2013, methodology): “5c,h may be eliminated in minimum-norm based spatial unwrapping methods (1,36,37).”
Temporal phase unwrapping algorithms for fringe projection profilometry: A comparative review (2016, background): “Interferometry [21], synthetic aperture radar (SAR) [22], magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [23], optical Doppler tomography [24], acoustic”
Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping of Human Brain Reflects Spatial Variation in Tissue Composition (2011, methodology): “Specifically, the Laplacian of the phase is calculated using only cosine and sine functions of the phase as follows (Schofield and Zhu, 2003):”