Additive partitioning of rarefaction curves and species–area relationships: unifying α‐, β‐ and γ‐diversity with sample size and habitat area

By T. O. Crist, J. Veech. 2006

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a697022709dea1509baaa9339274ab62cf17ec8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. (2011, background): “Second, biodiversity sample points should be spatially distributed within each landscape to allow diversity estimation at a range of spatial scales, such that diversity can be partitioned into alpha and beta diversity components (Wagner et al. 2000; Crist & Veech 2006; Tscharntke et al. 2007).”
The partitioning of diversity: showing Theseus a way out of the labyrinth (2010, background): “Several indices and mathematical frameworks have been developed for these purposes (Lande 1996; Veech et al. 2002; Crist & Veech 2006), making it possible to answer different ecological questions and unavoidably producing little consensus among methods (Koleff et al. 2003).”
Undersampling and the measurement of beta diversity (2013, unknown): “…hierarchical additive diversity partitioning has recently been developed as a promisingmethod to assess beta components of diversity (Crist et al. 2003; Crist & Veech 2006; Beck et al. 2012b; see Holloway 1996 for an R-mode approach assessing species co-occurrence within our empirical data).”
Scale- and taxon-dependent biodiversity patterns of dry grassland vegetation in Transylvania (2014, methodology): “The exponents of the power-law function, the so-called z-values, are a universal means of comparing species-area relationships (e.g. Drakare et al., 2006; Dengler, 2009a) and they can be considered as a measure of ˇ-diversity (Crist and Veech, 2006).”
Which function describes the species–area relationship best? A review and empirical evaluation (2009, background): “Although the individual SARs for islands (SAR type C) showed more peculiarities, these can be attributed to environmental differences owing to the non-nested design rather than to differences in the underlying SAR, as argued above (see Crist & Veech, 2006).”
Partitioning the diversity of riverine fish: The roles of habitat types and non-native species (2007, background): “This check is disregarded in most papers on additive diversity partitioning, although it is important to test how accurate the estimation of alpha diversity is if one wants to compare the relative role of alpha and beta components for species diversity patterns (e.g. Crist & Veech, 2006).”
Species richness change across spatial scales (2019, background): “This can also be directly linked to the concept of diversity partitioning (γ-diversity=α-5 diversity∗β-diversity) and the influence of biotic homogenization and differentiation through time 6 (e.g., Crist and Veech 2006, Scheiner et al. 2011, Socolar et al. 2016).”
Beyond taxonomic diversity patterns: how do α, β and γ components of bird functional and phylogenetic diversity respond to environmental gradients across France? (2011, unknown): “Beyond this multi-faceted nature of diversity, another level of complexity concerns spatial scale and structure (Loreau, 2000; Crist & Veech, 2006).”
Quantifying plant species diversity in a Natura 2000 network: Old ideas and new proposals (2008, methodology): “Recent developments related this approach to classical techniques such as species–area curves (Crist and Veech, 2006) or rarefaction curves (Olszewski, 2004).”
Species contribute differently to the taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic alpha and beta diversity of freshwater fish communities (2014, background): “In addition to characterizing different facets of community diversity (i.e. alpha diversity), geographic variation across communities can be quantified, (i.e. beta diversity) identifying another vital aspect of biological complexity (Whittaker, 1960; Loreau, 2000; Crist & Veech, 2006).”
A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 2. Quantifying beta diversity and related phenomena (2010, background): “4A; see also Crist and Veech 2006, Gardezi and Gonzalez 2008).”
Does pollen-assemblage richness reflect floristic richness? A review of recent developments and future challenges (2016, unknown): “1022 Rarefaction analysis is another potentially useful approach to estimating beta diversity (e.g. 1023 Olszewski, 2004, 2010; Crist and Veech, 2006).”