Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method based on a novel accuracy function under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment
By Jun Ye. Expert systems with applications, 2009
384 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a5aefc619c89c891172ab71e46ff828cbf63ad5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Control and Systems Engineering
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Methods for strategic decision-making problems with immediate probabilities in intuitionistic fuzzy setting (2012, methodology): “Ye [32] developed multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method based on a novel accuracy function under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment.”
- Similarity measures between interval neutrosophic sets and their applications in multicriteria decision-making (2014, neutral): “Let us consider the decision-making problem adapted from [7].”
- Generalized Pythagorean Fuzzy Geometric Aggregation Operators Using Einstein t‐Norm and t‐Conorm for Multicriteria Decision‐Making Process (2017, background): “5–15 However, there may be a situation where the decision maker may provide the degree of membership and nonmembership of a particular attribute in such a way that their sum is greater than 1.”
- TOPSIS-Based Nonlinear-Programming Methodology for Multiattribute Decision Making With Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (2010, methodology): “The ratings of the alternatives are given in the IVIF decision matrix as follows [9]:”
- A novel accuracy function under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment for solving multicriteria decision making problem (2016, positive): “If we apply Ye [5] approach for aggregating these different alternatives by using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy aggregating operator then we get Therefore, ranking of the alternative is A 2 (cid:10) A 4 A 3 (cid:10) A 1 , and thus, the most desirable alternative is A 2 .”