Statistical Issues in Resource Selection Studies with Radio-Marked Animals

By W. Erickson, T. Mcdonald, K. Gerow, S. Howlin, John W. Kern. 2001

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a4fdba26f34557b8d607aa850e85ac5d586af36

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. E. J. Taylor
2. S. Baruch‐Mordo
3. Dana L. Thomas
4. D. Lewis
5. S. Breck

In Small Animals

1. K. Wilson
2. E. J. Taylor
3. Dana L. Thomas
4. S. Breck

Citations in the corpus

• Foraging ecology of black bears in urban environments: guidance for human‐bear conflict mitigation (2015, background): “The advent of GPS technology for wildlife tracking now allows observations at a fine spatiotemporal scale (Erickson et al. 2001, Thomas and Taylor 2006); however, collection of fine-scale explanatory data remains a challenge as these are often not adequately summarized solely with GIS data (McClure…”
• Study Designs and Tests for Comparing Resource Use and Availability II (2006, methodology): “Study design choices also include whether data will be collected on individual animals or at the population level (Thomas and Taylor 1990, Erickson et al. 2001), the scale or scales of selection to be studied (Johnson 1980), and how use and availability (or nonuse) are defined and measured…”