Age-dependent DNA methylation of genes that are suppressed in stem cells is a hallmark of cancer.
By Andrew E. Teschendorff, U. Menon, A. Gentry-Maharaj, S. Ramus, D. Weisenberger, Hui Shen, Mihaela Campan, Houtan Noushmehr, C. Bell, A. Maxwell and 11 more. Genome Research, 2010
867 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Polycomb group proteins (PCGs) are involved in repression of genes that are required for stem cell differentiation. Recently, it was shown that promoters of PCG target genes (PCGTs) are 12-fold more likely to be methylated in cancer than non-PCGTs. Age is the most important demographic risk factor for cancer, and we hypothesized that its carcinogenic potential may be referred by irreversibly stabilizing stem cell features. To test this, we analyzed the methylation status of over 27,000 CpGs mapping to promoters of approximately 14,000 genes in whole blood samples from 261 postmenopausal women. We demonstrate that stem cell PCGTs are far more likely to become methylated with age than non-targets (odds ratio = 5.3 [3.8-7.4], P < 10(-10)), independently of sex, tissue type, disease state, and methylation platform. We identified a specific subset of 69 PCGT CpGs that undergo hypermethylation with age and validated this methylation signature in seven independent data sets encompassing over 900 samples, including normal and cancer solid tissues and a population of bone marrow mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (P < 10(-5)). We find that the age-PCGT methylation signature is present in preneoplastic conditions and may drive gene expression changes associated with carcinogenesis. These findings shed substantial novel insights into the epigenetic effects of aging and support the view that age may predispose to malignant transformation by irreversibly stabilizing stem cell features.
Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09ba3434cfd362f92e2c067942e4b66ed7e9f5d0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
- Hao Wu
- Steve Horvath
- Andrew E. Teschendorff
- Manel Esteller
- Keith D. Robertson
- Stephan Beck
- Michael S. Kobor
- Meaghan J. Jones
In Molecular Biology
- Steve Horvath
- Hao Wu
- Peter Langfelder
- Manel Esteller
- Michael S. Kobor
- Meaghan J. Jones
- S. Goodman
- Andrew E. Teschendorff
Citations in the corpus
- Epigenome-Wide Scans Identify Differentially Methylated Regions for Age and Age-Related Phenotypes in a Healthy Ageing Population (2012, neutral): “multiple tissues and organisms [11,12,13,14,15].”
- Epigenetic clock analysis of diet, exercise, education, and lifestyle factors (2017, neutral): “Chronological age has been shown to have a profound effect on DNA methylation levels [26-34].”
- DNA Methylation in Cancer and Aging. (2016, background): “Cancer Res; 76(12) June 15, 2016 Cancer Research OF2”
- Aging effects on DNA methylation modules in human brain and blood tissue (2012, background): “Data set 4 (type 1 diabetes) consists of WB samples from 190 individuals (93 women and 97 men) with a mean age of 44 years (range 24 to 74 years) [16].”
- Detection of differentially methylated regions from whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data without replicates (2015, background): “(2) Promoter regions of differentially expressed genes (DEGs).”
- Aging of blood can be tracked by DNA methylation changes at just three CpG sites (2014, methodology): “This may indicate that AR-DNAm changes are due to loss of DNAm maintenance at specific regions; hypermethylation happens in regions associated with repressive histone marks [15] and polycomb group protein targets [16], whereas hypomethylation may be enriched with other histone modifications, transcr”
- Integrative Analysis of Multi-omics Data for Discovery and Functional Studies of Complex Human Diseases (2016, background): “…Yang, Korn, Burwinkel, & Brenner, 2011; Shenker et al.; Sun, 2014; Sun, Smith, et al., 2013), poor nutrition(Waterland & Jirtle, 2003), genetic factors (Sun, 2014; D. Zhang et al., 2010), and age – all well known risk factors human diseases (Bocklandt et al., 2011; Teschendorff et al., 2010).”
- An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan (2018, background): “Chronological time has been shown to elicit predictable hypo- and hyper-methylation changes at many regions across the genome [3-7], and as a result, the first generation of DNAm based biomarkers of aging were developed to predict chronological chronological age [8-13].”
- Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications (2012, background): “Studies on ageing indicate that epigenetic variation over time preferentially occurs at specific loc”
- Epigenetic Predictor of Age (2011, background): “Recently, unbiased genomewide studies have documented age effects on DNA methylation in cultured cells [4], mice [5], and humans [6,7,8].”
- metilene: fast and sensitive calling of differentially methylated regions from bisulfite sequencing data (2016, background): “Furthermore, differential DNA methylation plays a role in many cancers, such as medulloblastoma (Hovestadt et al. 2014) and B-cell lymphoma (Kretzmer et al. 2015), and connects risk factors like age (Teschendorff et al. 2010) and smoking (Teschendorff et al. 2015) with cancer.”
- Polycomb group proteins: multi-faceted regulators of somatic stem cells and cancer. (2010, neutral): “For example, expression of the PRC1 protein BMI1 promotes cell proliferation and is essential for maintenance of cancer cells (Lessard and Sauvageau, 2003), while its paralog PCGF2/MEL18 (78% amino acid similarity; 97% similarity for RING domain) blocks cell proliferation and has tumor suppressive f”
- DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types (2013, methodology): “But several recent studies have shown that age-dependent CpG signatures can be defined independently of sex, tissue type, disease state and array platform [10,13-15,20-22].”
- DNA methylation: superior or subordinate in the epigenetic hierarchy? (2011, background): “DNA methylation of PcG target genes is present in preneoplastic conditions and may lead to aberrant gene expression associated with carcinogenesis.(71) Our laboratory reported that approximately 47% of DNMT3B-regulated genes were bound by PRC1 or PRC2 in human colon cancer, and we demonstrated a nov”