The generation of internal tides at abrupt topography

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Tidal conversion at a very steep ridge (2003, methodology): “Laurent et al. (2003) use the same knife-edge model, but with a uniform buoyancy frequency N = 2.8 c.p.h. Additionally they take L =2000 km, U = 0.014 m s−1, and b/h= 0.75; the resulting estimate is C ≈ 19 GW. The differences between our values for L, U , and N and those of St. Laurent et al. (2003)”
Energetics of Barotropic and Baroclinic Tides in the Monterey Bay Area (2012, methodology): “The formation of matrix Amn and vector cm are given by equations (17)- (20) in St. Laurent et al. (2003).”
The accuracy of surface elevations in forward global barotropic and baroclinic tide models (2004, background): “In agreement with other recent studies of global forward tide models (Jayne and St. Laurent, 2001—hereafter JS; Carrere and Lyard, 2003— hereafter CL; Egbert et al., 2004—hereafter ERB), we argue that topographic drag is a plausible mechanism for mid-ocean tidal dissipation.”
Preliminary simulations of internal waves and mixing generated by finite amplitude tidal flow over isolated topography (2006, background): “For the supercritical cases, the energy conversion is greater: for the “low narrow” case it approaches twice the subcritical value, as predicted by St Laurent et al. (2003) and Llewellyn Smith and Young (2003) for a knife-edge ridge.”