Droplet microfluidics for high-throughput biological assays.

By Mira T Guo, Assaf Rotem, J. Heyman, David A. Weitz. Lab on a Chip, 2012

963 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a1fe6a405dcc649afe6fdb7890d2a4902cea3ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. C. Hansen
2. Richard M. Maceiczyk
3. R. Wootton
4. D. Di Carlo
5. D. Chiu
6. Patrick Doyle
7. Bruce K. Gale
8. Andrew deMello

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. C. Hansen
2. Bruce K. Gale
3. Andrew deMello
4. T. P. Lagus
5. Jon F. Edd

Citations in the corpus

• Small but Perfectly Formed? Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities for Microfluidics in the Chemical and Biological Sciences (2017, background): “The term microfluidics, however, describes a set of techniques that has expanded its influence from early application in the analytical sciences and ink-jet printing(1) to problems in the complex syntheses of novel materials,(2) ultra-high-throughput biological assays,(3) and the simulation of entir”
• Droplet barcoding for single cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells (2015, neutral): “An alternative is the use of microfluidic droplets suspended in carrier oil (Guo et al. 2012; Teh et al. 2008).”
• A Review of Current Methods in Microfluidic Device Fabrication and Future Commercialization Prospects (2018, background): “These varied benefits have helped microfluidics find applications in many fields including analytical chemistry [4], energy generation [6], cell separations [3], and molecular biology [7].”