Modeling metal deposition in heat transfer analyses of additive manufacturing processes
By P. Michaleris. 2014
481 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a197de7b273a76564ede12a8ece36ef34244146
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- E. R. Denlinger
- Jarred Heigel
- F. Montevecchi
- Gianni Campatelli
- G. Venturini
- Antonio Scippa
- H. Mindt
- Allison M. Beese
In Mechanical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties (2018, methodology): “Finally, the hybrid activation method combines the element birth and quiet element methods, where only the current deposition layer is activated and set to quiet and all the subsequent layers to be deposited are deactivated [101].”
- Residual stress and distortion modeling of electron beam direct manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V (2015, methodology): “The thermal and mechanical analyses are performed using the code CUBIC by Pan Computing LLC.(14) The quiet element activation approach is used in this work, where elements representing the metal deposition regions are present from the start of the analysis.”
- A Review of Metal Additive Manufacturing Technologies (2018, background): “EBM is currently the preferred process for fabricating metals, but it is limited by the electrical conductivity of the material and the need to conduct the process in a vacuum.”
- Metal additive-manufacturing process and residual stress modeling (2016, methodology): “This approach is very similar to the one used in active/quiet element modeling as described in [59].”
- Finite Element Modelling of Wire-arc-additive-manufacturing Process (2016, methodology): “[10] Martukanitz R, Michaleris P, Palmer T, DebRoy T, Liu ZK, Otis R, Heo TW, Chen LQ.”