Mechanism of hard nanomaterial clearance by the liver
By Kim M. Tsoi, S. Macparland, Xuezhong Ma, V. Spetzler, Juan Echeverri, B. Ouyang, S. Fadel, Edward A. Sykes, N. Goldaracena, J. M. Kaths and 8 more. Nature Materials, 2016
838 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The liver and spleen are major biological barriers to translating nanomedicines because they sequester the majority of administered nanomaterials and prevent delivery to diseased tissue. Here we examined the blood clearance mechanism of administered hard nanomaterials in relation to blood flow dynamics, organ microarchitecture, and cellular phenotype. We found that nanomaterial velocity reduces 1000-fold as they enter and traverse the liver, leading to 7.5 times more nanomaterial interaction with hepatic cells relative to peripheral cells. In the liver, Kupffer cells (84.8%±6.4%), hepatic B cells (81.5±9.3%), and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (64.6±13.7%) interacted with administered PEGylated quantum dots but splenic macrophages took up less (25.4±10.1%) due to differences in phenotype. The uptake patterns were similar for two other nanomaterial types and five different surface chemistries. Potential new strategies to overcome off-target nanomaterial accumulation may involve manipulating intra-organ flow dynamics and modulating cellular phenotype to alter hepatic cell interaction.
Subfields: Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering, Pharmaceutical Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a11737dee65c658cbb5bfdb47c79265b8aa16c1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomaterials
- J. Kulkarni
- Camilla Hald Albertsen
- Handan Acar
- K. Petersson
- Stefan Wilhelm
- Marianne Lind
- Nathan D. Donahue
- J. Simonsen
In Biomedical Engineering
- J. Kulkarni
- Camilla Hald Albertsen
- Robert G. Parton
- K. Petersson
- Marianne Lind
- J. Simonsen
- D. Witzigmann
Citations in the corpus
- Key principles and methods for studying the endocytosis of biological and nanoparticle therapeutics (2021, background): “These interactions stabilize endophilin localized to the leading edge of migrating cells through the PtdIns(3,4)P2-binding protein lamellipodin.”
- The role of lipid components in lipid nanoparticles for vaccines and gene therapy (2022, positive): “[106] exploited the dimensions of the fenestrations in the liver, in an alternate way, to increase LNP accumulation in cells other than the Kupffer cells and LSECs that usually take up a significant portion of nanoparticles administered systemically [107].”
- Concepts of nanoparticle cellular uptake, intracellular trafficking, and kinetics in nanomedicine. (2019, background): “To reduce nanoparticle MPS sequestration, nanoparticle surface modifications have been developed to minimize nanoparticle opsonization [16].”
- Smart nanocarrier-based drug delivery systems for cancer therapy and toxicity studies: A review (2018, background): “Table 1 shows that the majority of nanocarriers are not discharged from body; instead, they accumulate in the vital organs mentioned above [292].”