Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts

By Steven Yantis, J. Schwarzbach, J. Serences, R. L. Carlson, M. A. Steinmetz, James J. Pekar, S. Courtney. Nature Neuroscience, 2002

727 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39ee74ca4a4bd2beb0c985303634883c77499b4d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Cerebral correlates of alerting, orienting and reorienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related fMRI study (2004, background): “The results showed that neural activity was reduced in superior parietal cortex in the hold condition (Yantis et al., 2002).”
Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention (2003, background): “…and neuroimaging studies of healthy human populations have implicated regions of the superior frontal cortex and the parietal cortex in the orienting of spatial attention (Corbetta et al., 1993; Gitelman et al., 1999; Mesulam, 1990; Nobre et al., 1997; Posner et al., 1984; Yantis et al., 2002).”
A Boolean map theory of visual attention. (2007, background): “In recent years, many researchers have been seeking to identify neural correlates or underpinnings of visual attention (e.g., Boynton, 2005; Bundesen, Habekost, & Kyllingsbaek, 2005; Gandhi, Heeger, & Boynton, 1999; Kastner, De Weerd, Desimone, & Ungerleider, 1998; O’Craven, Downing, & Kanwisher, 19”
Cortical capacity constraints for visual working memory: dissociation of fMRI load effects in a fronto-parietal network (2003, background): “This would lead to increased prefrontal activation, which has also been reported for supracapacity verbal memory conditions (Rypma and Gabrieli, 2000), while activation of the classical visual attention-related network constituting the posterior parietal cortex and the frontal eye fields (Goebel et ”
A P300-based brain-computer interface: initial tests by ALS patients. (2006, background): “Although eye movements are not required to orient attention (Posner, 1980; Yantis et al., 2002), involuntary eye movements may make it difficult to orient attention to a specific location.”
Attention Reverses the Effect of Prediction in Silencing Sensory Signals (2011, neutral): “5B), possibly reflecting increased reorienting of attention (Yantis et al. 2002) at the time of the attention cue, when the prediction cue had indicated the opposite hemifield compared with when the prediction cue indicated the same hemifield as the attention cue.”
Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: a combined ERP and fMRI study (2004, background): “Since transient SPL/IPS activation correlates with attention switching (Rushworth et al., 2001; Yantis et al., 2002), the SPL/IPS activity in the distractor condition of our study could indeed indicate a disengagement of attention, previously focused on the target/standard discrimination, and a subs”
Development of attentional networks: An fMRI study with children and adults (2005, result): “This is in good accordance with previous studies showing that the inferior and superior parietal cortex (Yantis et al., 2002), and specifically the temporo-parietal junction (Corbetta and Shulman, 2002), as well as inferior frontal regions are involved in shifting attention.”
Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation (2004, result): “This finding is consistent with earlier reports associating the cognitive effort of paying attention with increased neural activity in ventral occipitotemporal region”
States versus Rewards: Dissociable neural prediction error signals underlying model-based and model-free reinforcement learning (2010, background): “Further, the areas correlated with the SPE signal are thought to be involved in aspects of attention (the PPC with orienting/salience [Yantis et al., 2002] and frontal regions with executive control [Corbetta et al., 2000; MacDonald et al., 2000]).”
Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. (2009, neutral): “…et al., 1998), and in tasks that manipulate arousal (Kinomura et al., 1996; Sturm et al., 1999; Sturm and Willmes, 2001), or require participants to shift (Corbetta and Shulman, 2002; Yantis et al., 2002), or sustain attention (Coull et al., 1996; Coull and Nobre, 1998; Manly et al., 2003).”
Computational visual attention systems and their cognitive foundations: A survey (2010, background): “Do we attend to spatial locations, to features, or to objects? The majority of studies, both from psychophysics and from neurobiology, is about space-based attention (also referred to as location-based attention) [Posner 1980; Eriksen and St. James 1986; Yantis et al. 2002; Bisley and Goldberg 2003]”
Between-Task Competition and Cognitive Control in Task Switching (2006, background): “…insula/operculum, posterior cingulate, precuneus, and parietal cortex (Dove et al., 2000; Kimberg et al., 2000; MacDonald et al., 2000; Sohn et al., 2000; Brass and von Cramon, 2002; Dreher et al., 2002; Rushworth et al., 2002; Yantis et al., 2002; Braver et al., 2003; Serences et al., 2004).”
The Curious Incident of Attention in Multisensory Integration: Bottom-up vs. Top-down (2016, neutral): “…has been found to be activated when subjects focused endogenous attention to discriminate either auditory or tactile targets (Hill and Miller, 2010; Yantis et al., 2002; Macaluso et al., 2003; Krumbholz et al., 2008); while the ventral network was found to be activated when participants…”
Report Human Parietal Cortex Structure Predicts Individual Differences in Perceptual Rivalry (2010, background): “The SPL loci identified here are anatomically very close to those parietal regions that show transient activations when participants shift their attention between locations [20, 21] or between spatially overlapping objects [22].”
Parietal cortex and attention. (2004, background): “Whereas spatial shifts are accompanied by increased activation in the SPL region of the parietal lobe [7 ], non-spatial shifts are accompanied by increased activity in the precuneus region, the continuation of the SPL on the medial side of the parietal lobe.”
A taxonomy of external and internal attention. (2011, neutral): “Cuing improves target detection and discrimination (Corbetta & Shulman 2002, Yantis et al. 2002 ), and the time course of facilitation reveals two modes of attention .”
Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. (2006, neutral): “…by allocating attention (via activity in the FEF (e.g., Corbetta et al., 1998; Moore & Fallah, 2004) and parietal attention centers (e.g., Yantis et al., 2002)) to regions of extrastriate and parietal cortex responsible for the perception of location (Awh, Anllo-Vento, & Hillyard, 2000;…”