Premarital sex in America: how young Americans meet, mate and think about marrying

By Itzel Eguiluz. 2013

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Gender Studies, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39e877c720a12f399404a3953ec61202da6ca572

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. J. Bearak
2. Laura M. Padilla‐Walker
3. Sarah M. Coyne
4. P. England
5. R. Glauber
6. Michelle J. Budig
7. S. Stack
8. David C. Ribar

In Gender Studies

1. J. Bearak
2. Laura M. Padilla‐Walker
3. Sarah M. Coyne
4. P. England
5. R. Glauber
6. Michelle J. Budig
7. David C. Ribar
8. S. Stack

In General Health Professions

1. Laura M. Padilla‐Walker
2. Sarah M. Coyne
3. P. England
4. J. Bearak

Citations in the corpus

• Accounting for Women’s Orgasm and Sexual Enjoyment in College Hookups and Relationships (2012, background): “Scholars have offered a variety of explanations for gender differences in how commitment and affection affect sexual satisfaction.5 These researchers tend to treat gender differences in sexuality as a durable social fact (Baumeister and Vohs 2004; Regnerus and Uecker 2011).”
• The sexual double standard and gender differences in attitudes toward casual sex among U.S. university students (2014, background): “(For similar views see Glenn and Marquardt 2001; Regnerus and Uecker 2011; Regnerus 2012).”
• Emerging in a Digital World (2013, background): “Emerging adulthood has perhaps most consistently been identified as a time of identity exploration, particularly in the areas of love, work, and worldviews (Arnett, 2006), as well as ethnic identity (Phinney, 2006) and sexuality (Lefkowitz & Gillen, 2006; Regnerus & Uecker, 2011).”