Quintessence, superquintessence, and observable quantities in Brans-Dicke and nonminimally coupled theories
By D. Torres. 2002
175 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The different definitions for the equation of state of a nonminimally coupled scalar field that have been introduced in the literature are analyzed. Particular emphasis is made upon those features that could yield an observable way of distinguishing nonminimally coupled theories from general relativity, with the same or with alternate potentials. It is found that some earlier claims that superquintessence, a stage of superaccelerated expansion of the universe, is possible within realistic nonminimally coupled theories are the result of an arguable definition of the equation of state. In particular, it is shown that these previous results do not import any observable consequence, i.e., that the theories are observationally identical to general relativity models and that superquintessence is not more than a mathematical outcome. Finally, in the case of nonminimally coupled theories with coupling $F=1+\ensuremath{\xi}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}^{2}$ and tracking potentials, it is shown that no superquintessence is possible.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39e0a271d4eef196bbf44405bed10de312005317
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Antonio de Felice
- S. Tsujikawa
- Lavinia Heisenberg
- Emmanuel N. Saridakis
- Tsutomu Kobayashi
- Kurt Hinterbichler
- Salvatore Capozziello
- Francisco S. N. Lobo
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Antonio de Felice
- S. Tsujikawa
- Lavinia Heisenberg
- Emmanuel N. Saridakis
- Kurt Hinterbichler
- Francisco S. N. Lobo
- Salvatore Capozziello
- Claudia de Rham
Citations in the corpus
- f(R) Theories (2010, background): “This choice may be suitable if the deviation of F0 from 1 is small (as in scalar-tensor theory with a nearly massless scalar field [583, 93]).”