DNA methylation GrimAge strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan

By A. Lu, Austin Quach, James G. Wilson, A. Reiner, A. Aviv, K. Raj, Lifang Hou, Andrea A. Baccarelli, Yun Li, J. Stewart and 4 more. Aging, 2019

2,021 citations recorded by the source corpus.

It was unknown whether plasma protein levels can be estimated based on DNA methylation (DNAm) levels, and if so, how the resulting surrogates can be consolidated into a powerful predictor of lifespan. We present here, seven DNAm-based estimators of plasma proteins including those of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) and growth differentiation factor 15. The resulting predictor of lifespan, DNAm GrimAge (in units of years), is a composite biomarker based on the seven DNAm surrogates and a DNAm-based estimator of smoking pack-years. Adjusting DNAm GrimAge for chronological age generated novel measure of epigenetic age acceleration, AgeAccelGrim. Using large scale validation data from thousands of individuals, we demonstrate that DNAm GrimAge stands out among existing epigenetic clocks in terms of its predictive ability for time-to-death (Cox regression P=2.0E-75), time-to-coronary heart disease (Cox P=6.2E-24), time-to-cancer (P= 1.3E-12), its strong relationship with computed tomography data for fatty liver/excess visceral fat, and age-at-menopause (P=1.6E-12). AgeAccelGrim is strongly associated with a host of age-related conditions including comorbidity count (P=3.45E-17). Similarly, age-adjusted DNAm PAI-1 levels are associated with lifespan (P=5.4E-28), comorbidity count (P= 7.3E-56) and type 2 diabetes (P=2.0E-26). These DNAm-based biomarkers show the expected relationship with lifestyle factors including healthy diet and educational attainment. Overall, these epigenetic biomarkers are expected to find many applications including human anti-aging studies.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39df53d7fdd4243312459c18435601d370d369cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. D. Kwon
  2. Daniel W Belsky
  3. T. Wyss‐Coray
  4. J. Rutledge
  5. Luigi Ferrucci
  6. Jonathan Mill
  7. H. Oh
  8. David L. Corcoran

In Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

  1. T. Wyss‐Coray
  2. J. Rutledge
  3. H. Harrington
  4. D. Kwon
  5. Luigi Ferrucci
  6. H. Oh
  7. David L. Corcoran
  8. Benjamin S. Williams

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Terrie E. Moffitt
  2. Avshalom Caspi
  3. H. Harrington
  4. Richie Poulton
  5. Alex R. Piquero
  6. P. J. Frick
  7. D. Osgood

Citations in the corpus