FAMILY BRIDGES: USING INSIGHTS FROM SOCIAL SCIENCE TO RECONNECT PARENTS AND ALIENATED CHILDREN*

By R. Warshak. 2010

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Demography, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39d36c182f9c200ec45f618d7dacbe74e8a9d5c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. B. Garber
2. N. Bala
3. A. Baker
4. B. J. Fidler

In Demography

1. B. Garber
2. N. Bala
3. B. J. Fidler
4. S. Morrison
5. Wilfrid von Boch-Galhau
6. W. Bernet
7. A. Baker
8. N. Ben-Ami

In Safety Research

1. B. Garber
2. S. Morrison
3. Wilfrid von Boch-Galhau
4. N. Bala
5. W. Bernet
6. A. Baker
7. B. J. Fidler

Citations in the corpus

• CHILDREN RESISTING POSTSEPARATION CONTACT WITH A PARENT: CONCEPTS, CONTROVERSIES, AND CONUNDRUMS (2010, methodology): “One needs to ask not only about the ethical issues of intervening when children protest, but also about the ethical issues when intervention is not provided to protect children from abusive parenting (Warshak, 2010b).”
• PARENTAL ALIENATION AND THE DYNAMICS OF THE ENMESHED PARENT–CHILD DYAD: ADULTIFICATION, PARENTIFICATION, AND INFANTILIZATION (2011, background): “A child’s rejection of one parent in favor of another is a symptom of a disturbed system, not simply a disturbed child or a single disturbed relationship (Johnston, Walters & Friedlander, 2001; Lebow, 2002, 2005; Sullivan & Kelly, 2001; Sullivan, Ward & Deutsch, 2010; Warshak, 2010).”
• Parental Alienation, DSM-V, and ICD-11 (2010, background): “The large majority of children and adolescents who participated in this program achieved and maintained a positive relationship with the previously rejected parent ( Warshak, 2010a ).”