Oil and Autocratic Regime Survival

By Joseph G Wright, Erica Frantz, B. Geddes. 2015

189 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39cf9e7f09d0e9d6cac439660baea5a9c4cfa961

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

1. Jørgen Juel Andersen
2. E. Papyrakis
3. E. Gilberthorpe
4. S. Aslaksen

In Economics and Econometrics

1. E. Papyrakis
2. E. Gilberthorpe
3. Jørgen Juel Andersen
4. S. Aslaksen
5. Michael L. Ross
6. F. van der ploeg
7. Shuai Shao
8. Lili Yang

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jørgen Juel Andersen
2. E. Papyrakis
3. E. Gilberthorpe
4. S. Aslaksen
5. F. van der ploeg
6. Michael L. Ross
7. Atsushi Iimi

Citations in the corpus

• The extractive industries and development: The resource curse at the micro, meso and macro levels (2015, background): “…that it is the extent of mineral wealth that matters for democratic accountability rather than any shorter term changes in mineral affluence (e.g. a short-term income windfall induced by price fluctuations; see Haber and Menaldo, 2010; Wacziarg, 2012; Wright et al., 2015; Andersen and Ross, 2014).”
• Oil and political survival (2013, methodology): “The relevance of this mechanism is supported by recent evidence in Wright et al. (2012) who, using di¤erent variants of the logit model and a di¤erent de nition of leadership survival than we do, document that oil wealth positively a¤ects the likelihood that autocratic leaderships remain in power.”