The Three-dimensional Interaction between Emerging Magnetic Flux and a Large-Scale Coronal Field: Reconnection, Current Sheets, and Jets

By V. Archontis, F. Moreno-Insertis, K. Galsgaard, A. Hood. 2005

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/399a93d67548b3f28052716713a9877bad9bb14a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

Citations in the corpus

Jets in Coronal Holes: Hinode Observations and Three-dimensional Computer Modeling (2007, background): “…consequent launching of jets along field lines in the corona, as proposed through theoretical or 2D numerical results (Heyvaerts et al. 1977; Yokoyama & Shibata 1996) and through 3D experiments of jet formation in a horizontally magnetized atmosphere (Archontis et al. 2005; Galsgaard et al. 2007).”
A MODEL FOR SOLAR POLAR JETS (2009, background): “…in two dimensions (2D) (Yokoyama & Shibata 1995, 1996; Miyagoshi & Yokoyama 2004; Isobe et al. 2007), 2.5D (Karpen et al. 1998; Archontis et al. 2007), and 3D (Archontis et al. 2005, 2006; Isobe et al. 2006), but the latter have focused primarily on the interaction between closed field structures.”
Coronal prominence structure and dynamics: A magnetic flux rope interpretation (2006, methodology): “This and other simulations [Longcope and Welsch, 2000; Amari et al., 2004b; Archontis et al., 2005] indicate that even when a flux rope does not”
Magnetic flux emergence in granular convection: radiative MHD simulations and observational signatures (2007, unknown): “…evolution of the emerging magnetic field in the corona (Fan, 2001; Magara, 2001; Magara & Longcope, 2003; Fan & Gibson, 2004; Abbett & Fisher, 2003; Archontis et al., 2004, 2005; Török & Kliem, 2005; Isobe et al., 2005; Galsgaard et al., 2005; Leake & Arber, 2006; Murray et al., 2006; Galsgaard…”
Onset of Coronal Mass Ejections Due to Loss of Confinement of Coronal Flux Ropes (2007, background): “…it does not address the actual complex dynamics involved in the emergence of a buoyant flux tube through the stably stratified lower solar atmosphere into the corona (e.g., Fan 2001;Magara&Longcope 2001; Magara 2004;Manchester et al. 2004; Archontis et al. 2004, 2005, 2006; Murray et al. 2006).”
THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING OF QUASI-HOMOLOGOUS SOLAR JETS (2010, background): “…confirmed that magnetic reconnection at a null point can explain numerous observable properties of jets (Yokoyama & Shibata 1995, 1996; Miyagoshi & Yokoyama 2004; Archontis et al. 2004, 2005, 2007; Galsgaard et al. 2007; Moreno-Insertis et al. 2008; Gontikakis et al. 2009; Archontis et al. 2010).”
Driving major solar flares and eruptions: A review (2008, background): “…impose more twist than warranted by observations, as most active regions emerge with archfilament systems mostly aligned with the eventual dipole axis of the region rather than nearly perpendicular to it as in many simulations (e.g., Archontis et al. 2005; Magara 2006; Manchester 2007; Fan 2008).”
Magnetic Fields in the Solar Convection Zone (2004, methodology): “The interaction with the preexisting coronal field tends to slow down the rise speed of the upper-boundary of the emerging flux tube into the corona, compared to the case where the flux tube emerges into a field-free atmosphere (Archontis et al., 2005).”
Eruption of magnetic flux ropes during flux emergence (2008, unknown): “The setup of our experiments is very similar to that of Archontis et al. (2005).”