PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT INTEGRATION SCHEMES IN FACING DISCONTINUITIES IN THE FINITE CELL METHOD

By Ali Abedian, Jamshid Parvizian, Alexander Düster, Hassan Khademyzadeh, Ernst Rank. 2013

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/399161c2ce5a9da15c0cfe2437a4e2cb40a05a16

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

1. Alexander Düster
2. Ernst Rank
3. Barna Szabó
4. Elena Benvenuti
5. Giulio Ventura
6. Dominik Schillinger
7. Meysam Joulaian
8. Martin Ruess

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Ernst Rank
2. Alexander Düster
3. Barna Szabó
4. Elena Benvenuti
5. Giulio Ventura

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Alexander Düster
2. Ernst Rank
3. Barna Szabó
4. Elena Benvenuti
5. Giulio Ventura
6. Dominik Schillinger
7. Meysam Joulaian
8. Martin Ruess

Citations in the corpus

• The p-Version of the Finite Element and Finite Cell Methods (2017, methodology): “Similar observations have been made for elastoplasticity (Abedian et al., 2013b,2014); as well as for damage mechanics (Ranjbar et al., 2014). Coupled problems arising, for example, in thermoelasticity have been solved with the FCM in Zander et al. (2012). Furthermore, the FCM has been extended to p”
• Equivalent polynomials for quadrature in Heaviside function enriched elements (2015, background): “Some comparisons between different integration schemes have been recently given in [26].”