Building information modelling - Experts' views on standardisation and industry deployment
By R. Howard, Bo-Christer Björk. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2008
393 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Building and Construction, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39792a0569dca30c7947946c1b137558c9f48916
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Building and Construction
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- A theoretical framework of a BIM-based multi-disciplinary collaboration platform (2011, neutral): “The FGI data echo some of the earlier findings that lack of initiative and training [6], technical concerns and lack of technical knowhow [4,15], fragmented nature of the AEC/FM industry, varied market readiness across geographies, industry's reluctance to change existing work practice [2,17,19], th”
- A State-of-the-Art Review on the Integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Geographic Information System (GIS) (2017, background): “Large asset owners are becoming aware of the advantages of applying information management techniques in reaching more comprehensive solutions [106].”
- A review and outlook for a 'Building Information Model' (BIM): A multi-standpoint framework for technological development (2011, methodology): “Theoretical foundations – theories: Systems theory [122], information theory [103], observational theory [18] Studies on the use of ICT in construction: ICT use within the construction organisation [102] and between organisations [1], industry preparedness [4] and project communication [124] BIM rev”
- Systems integration and collaboration in architecture, engineering, construction, and facilities management: A review (2010, background): “IFCs have now had 10 years of development, but with insufficient resources and dependence on a small number of experts [31].”