On Reference to Kinds in Indonesian
By Sandra Chung. 2000
61 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cultural Studies, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/396a983074094570d2e640585d0b1fef3621f37f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cultural Studies
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- THE SEMANTICS OF GENERIC QUANTIFICATION IN BRAZILIAN PORTUGUESE (2002, background): “15 {a,b,c} (42) [[revista]] = {a,b} {a,c} {b,c} a b c But contrary to languages like Chinese or Indonesian that are said to have mass-like denotations for its common nouns, BP has number morphology and no overt classifier system (cf. Krifka 1995, Chierchia 1998b, Chung 2000).”
- Bare nouns and number in Dëne Sųłiné (2008, background): “For example, bare nouns can optionally be plural-marked in Indonesian, Hungarian, Turkish, Korean, and to some extent in Mandarin ( Chung 2000; Ortmann 2000; Kang 1994; Rullmann and You 2006).”
- General Number and the Semantics and Pragmatics of Indefinite Bare Nouns in Mandarin Chinese (2006, unknown): “Counterexamples to Chierchia’s generalization are classifier languages which do have a plural marker, such as Korean and Malay/Indonesian (Kang 1994, Chung 2000, Carson 2000).”