Trading in Illusions

By Dani Rodrik. 2001

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Visual Arts and Performing Arts

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3967ea266854e847725772eb8d4e60db33820013

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. D. Craig
2. D. Porter
3. Robert H. Wade
4. Matthew D. Stephen

In Visual Arts and Performing Arts

1. D. Craig
2. D. Porter
3. Robert H. Wade

Citations in the corpus

• What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’ (2003, background): “As Dani Rodrik observes, ‘Global integration has become, for all practical purposes, a substitute for a development strategy’ despite its ‘shaky empirical ground’ and the serious distortion it gives to policymakers’ priorities (Rodrik, 2001).”
• Is Globalization Reducing Poverty and Inequality? (2004, background): “The conclusion does not follow (for this discussion I draw on the arguments of Rodrik (57, 58)).”
• Quantifying the Impact of Services Liberalization in a Developing Country (2006, unknown): “Nevertheless, as Rodrik (2001) has pointed out, traditional trade liberalization seems not to have fully delivered on its promise for prosperity.”
• Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: A New Convergence (2003, background): “Thus as Rodrik observes " Global integration has become, for all practical purposes, a substitute for a development strategy " despite its " shaky empirical ground " and the serious distortion it gives to policymakers' priorities (Rodrik 2001).”
• Exchanging development for market access? Deep integration and industrial policy under multilateral and regional-bilateral trade agreements (2005, unknown): “Writing about the WTO, for example, Amsden and Hikino (2000) and Tussie (1997) emphasize that developing countries have significant degrees of discretion for autonomous policy formulation, while Rodrik (2001), UNDP (2003), and Wade (2003) depict a considerablymore restrictive environment.”