Using Emotional Solidarity to Explain Residents’ Attitudes about Tourism and Tourism Development
By K. Woosnam. 2012
336 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/395680e5a91cb75a88236679d7cc536b10a22bad
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Manuel Alector Ribeiro
- K. Woosnam
- E. Erul
- Dongoh Joo
- Xiangping Li
- Yim King Penny Wan
- Haywantee Ramkissoon
- Heetae Cho
In Sociology and Political Science
- K. Woosnam
- Manuel Alector Ribeiro
- Haywantee Ramkissoon
- Yim King Penny Wan
- A. Tasci
- Xiangping Li
- Robin Nunkoo
- D. Stylidis
Citations in the corpus
- Applying self-perception theory to explain residents' attitudes about tourism development through travel histories (2018, background): “In essence, consideration of the TUH framework allows for an empathetic, introspective examination of how a person may formulate perspectives of positive or negative attitudes about tourism (Woosnam, 2012); affording the opportunity to consider tourism impacts ‘through the eyes’ of being a tourist.”
- The effect of place image and place attachment on residents’ perceived value and support for tourism development (2020, background): “, 2014) and emotional solidarity (Woosnam, 2012) can be considered as potential predictors.”
- Destination loyalty as explained through self-congruity, emotional solidarity, and travel satisfaction (2020, background): “…welcomed (or welcoming nature)—which make up intergroup emotional solidarity—deviated from one another in how they explained residents' support for tourism (Woosnam, 2012), tourists' expenditure patterns (Woosnam et al., 2015), or tourists' perception of tourism impacts (Joo, Cho, & Woosnam, 2019).”
- The Influence of Place Attachment on Social Distance: Examining Mediating Effects of Emotional Solidarity and the Moderating Role of Interaction (2019, background): “These findings complement past studies (i.e., Joo et al. 2018; Woosnam 2012; Woosnam and Aleshinloye 2013) that found visitors with higher emotional solidarity with local residents evidence greater openness (i.”
- Residents’ support for festivals: integration of emotional solidarity (2017, methodology): “The factor structure of emotional solidarity is confirmed, yielding a three-factor solution, consistent with that of Woosnam and his colleagues’ studies (Woosnam, 2011a, 2011b, 2012; Woosnam & Aleshinloye, 2012, 2013, 2015; Woosnam & Norman, 2010; Woosnam et al., 2009).”
- Considering emotional solidarity and the theory of planned behavior in explaining behavioral intentions to support tourism development (2020, background): “Woosnam (2011) suggested that the ES theoretical framework should not be considered the only framework used to explain the relationship between residents and tourists.”
- Destination image during the COVID-19 pandemic and future travel behavior: The moderating role of past experience (2021, background): “The relationship between tourists and a destination and its residents can be explained through emotional solidarity (Woosnam, 2011; Woosnam et al., 2015).”
- Residents’ impact perceptions of and attitudes towards tourism development: a meta-analysis (2018, background): “its exclusive emphasizing on resident’s rationality while overlooking the impact of affective responses (e.g. Ouyang, Gursoy, & Sharma, 2017; Rasoolimanesh, Jaafar, Kock, & Ramayah, 2015; Woosnam, 2012; Woosnam & Norman, 2010).”
- Exploring tourists' perceptions of tourism impacts (2019, methodology): “Focusing on “affective bonds individuals feel with one another” (Woosnam, 2008, p. 16), Woosnam (2012) and Hasani, Moghavvemi, and Hamzah (2016) each found that residents with greater emotional solidarity with tourists also demonstrated more optimistic views of the impacts of tourism.”
- Explaining Residents’ Behavioral Support for Tourism through Two Theoretical Frameworks (2021, methodology): “The next four utilized measures were the theory of planned behavior constructs: attitudinal support for tourism and attitudinal contributions to the community (Woosnam 2012), perceived behavioral control (S. T. Wu and Chen 2018), and subjective norms (H. Han, Hsu, and Sheu 2010).”
- Residents’ perceived risk, emotional solidarity, and support for tourism amidst the COVID-19 pandemic (2021, neutral): “Especially, Jeju—as an island far off the mainland with exotic culture and environment—has much in common with many famous destinations as well, such as Hawaii of the U.S., Okinawa of Japan, or Canary Islands of Spain, to name a few.”
- Tourist development and host–guest interaction: An economic exchange theory (2016, neutral): “Some progress has been made in a number of studies that draw on social exchange theory, but again there is a discernible bias towards residents that limits the possibility of understanding residents’ perceptions as part of an exchange process (Woosnam, 2012).”
- Social determinants of place attachment at a World Heritage Site (2018, background): “…have followed indicating interaction serves as a significant predictor of residents’ emotional solidarity or emotional closeness with tourists (Woosnam, 2011a, 2011b, 2012; Kirillova, Lehto,& Cai, 2015; Prentice et al., 1994; Reisinger & Turner, 2003; Woosnam & Aleshinloye, 2013; Yu & Lee,…”
- Empowerment and resident support for tourism in rural Central and Eastern Europe (CEE): the case of Pomerania, Poland (2017, methodology): “Lastly, the census-guided systematic sampling process structured off of Woosnam (2012) and Boley and McGehee’s (2014) research was met with a few challenges.”
- Perceived social impacts of tourism and quality-of-life: a new conceptual model (2020, background): “Literature evidences that residents’ tourism perception research can be traced back to 40 years ago (Shapley, 2014) with studies evolving with more theoretical awareness (Woosnam, 2012) and methodological sophistication (see Nunkoo et al., 2012).”
- Tourists’ Destination Loyalty through Emotional Solidarity with Residents: An Integrative Moderated Mediation Model (2018, background): “solidarity has been considered minimally (see Lai and Hitchcock 2016; Woosnam 2012; Woosnam et al. 2015; Woosnam, Dudensing, and Walker 2015) as an antecedent of other measures within the tourism literature.”