Galago: A Modular Distributed Processing and Retrieval System

19 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyond (2020, background): “odels, query evaluation algorithms, or index organizations. An incomplete list, past and present, includes (in an arbitrary order) Lemur/Indri [Metzler and Croft, 2004, Metzler et al., 2004], Galago [Cartright et al., 2012], Terrier [Ounis et al., 2006, Macdonald et al., 2012], ATIRE [Trotman et al.”
Anserini (2018, background): “Furthermore, Lucene is able to achieve this feat in a multithreaded setting on a single server, without having to resort to distributed frameworks such as MapReduce, as with previous academic systems [15, 30].”
Anserini: Enabling the Use of Lucene for Information Retrieval Research (2017, background): “While academic researchers have aempted to address this issue via MapReduce and related frameworks [5, 11], these solutions impose the burden of requiring clusters and additional soware infrastructure.”
The Lucene for Information Access and Retrieval Research (LIARR) Workshop at SIGIR 2017 (2017, methodology): “An incomplete list includes SMART [18], Lemur/Indri [15, 16], Galago [8], Terrier [14, 17], ATIRE [20], Ivory [12], JASS [13], MG4J [6], Wumpus [21], and Zeair [25].”
Toward Reproducible Baselines: The Open-Source IR Reproducibility Challenge (2016, methodology): “In total, developers from seven open-source systems participated (in alphabetical order): ATIRE [16], Galago [6], Indri [10,12], JASS [9], Lucene [2], MG4J [3], and Terrier [14].”