Quantum critical behavior in itinerant electron systems: Eliashberg theory and instability of a ferromagnetic quantum critical point

By J. Rech, C. Pépin, A. Chubukov. 2006

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We consider the problem of fermions interacting with gapless long-wavelength collective bosonic modes. The theory describes, among other cases, a ferromagnetic quantum-critical point (QCP) and a QCP towards nematic ordering. We construct a controllable expansion at the QCP in two steps: we first create a non-Fermi-liquid ``zero-order'' Eliashberg-type theory, and then demonstrate that the residual interaction effects are small. We prove that this approach is justified under two conditions: the interaction should be smaller than the fermionic bandwidth, and either the band mass ${m}_{B}$ should be much smaller than $m={k}_{F}∕{v}_{F}$, or the number of fermionic flavors $N$ should be large. For an SU(2) symmetric ferromagnetic QCP, we find that the Eliashberg theory itself includes a set of singular renormalizations which can be understood as a consequence of an effective long-range dynamic interaction between quasiparticles, generated by the Landau damping term. These singular renormalizations give rise to a negative nonanalytic ${q}^{3∕2}$ correction to the static spin susceptibility, and destroy a ferromagnetic QCP. We demonstrate that this effect can be understood in the framework of the ${\ensuremath{\phi}}^{4}$ theory of quantum criticality. We also show that the nonanalytic ${q}^{3∕2}$ correction to the bosonic propagator is specific to the SU(2) symmetric case. For systems with a scalar order parameter, the ${q}^{3∕2}$ contributions from individual diagrams cancel out in the full expression of the susceptibility, and the QCP remains stable.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39505e4c2d3c676d459ba99580d7096ca3a46426

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. W. Metzner
  2. Carsten Honerkamp
  3. K. Schoenhammer
  4. Manfred Salmhofer
  5. V. Meden

In Condensed Matter Physics

  1. W. Metzner
  2. Carsten Honerkamp
  3. K. Schoenhammer
  4. Manfred Salmhofer
  5. V. Meden

Citations in the corpus