Economics of knowledge
By Dominique Foray. 2004
669 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/394cf8023521d451aaa2a7e630d246e415c241c2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- E. Stam
- Ron A. Boschma
- F. Quatraro
- Koen Frenken
- Andrew H. Van de Ven
- Anne Nygaard Tanner
- Matthias Doepke
- David de la Croix
Citations in the corpus
- Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms (2016, background): “Formal approprability mechanisms can also facilitate the flow of the tacit component of knowledge—for example, when clauses of assistance and/or exchange of employees are included in licensing contracts (Foray, 2004).”
- Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements (2019, background): “There is a conceptual distinction between human capital (talent) and knowledge (Romer 1989; Foray 2004).”
- Minerva Unbound: Knowledge Stocks, Knowledge Flows and New Knowledge Production (2007, neutral): “Researchers in the economics of scientific knowledge have long been concerned to assess the impact of knowledge production on economic growth (see, e.g., Stephan, 1996; Foray, 2004).”
- Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration. (2013, background): “The final goal is to stimulate knowledge creation and diffusion as prime sources for sustainable economic growth in the long run (Foray 2004; Romer 1990).”
- Clans, Guilds, and Markets: Apprenticeship Institutions and Growth in the Pre-Industrial Economy (2016, background): “Historically, this knowledge was almost entirely “tacit” knowledge, in the standard sense used today in the economics of knowledge literature (Cowan and Foray 1997, 71–73; Foray 2004, 96–98).”
- Re-inventing invention: new tendencies in capitalist commodification (2006, background): “... the commodity involvements of consumers and others, under the general slogan ‘not all the smart people work for you’ (Chesbrough 2003), has proved particularly important, and I will therefore concentrate more attention on it. A change in the technical background, most notably the mass codificati”
- Models of knowledge and systems of governance (2005, background): “The evidence, especially in new information and communication technologies, confirms that proximity matters in assessing the rates of introduction of innovation (Foray, 2004).”
- The Scientific Trajectory of the French School of Proximity: Interaction- and Institution-based Approaches to Regional Innovation Systems (2008, background): “In view of the set of theories to which proximity approaches refer, and since most of them focus on the geography of productive and innovative activities, knowledge economy is often at the heart of proximity analysis (Antonelli, 2006 ; Foray, 2004 ).”
- Intellectual capital in universities (2006, background): “Such a need for information refers both to the stock of intangibles and also to the strategies and activities that the organisations are developing to improve those assets ( Foray, 2004”