Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship
By B. Griffiths, Karl Ritz, R. Bardgett, R. Cook, S. Christensen, F. Ekelund, S. Sørensen, E. Bååth, J. Bloem, P. C. Ruiter and 2 more. 2000
637 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/392134a1b428c5cc4ace5df7223a4621a4ca5def
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- David A. Wardle
- Barbara C. Schmid
- Michel Loreau
- Stefan Baumgärtner
- J. Emmett Duffy
- Andy Hector
- S. Lavorel
- Shahid Naeem
In Plant Science
- Josep Peñuelas
- K. Treseder
- S. Allison
- Matthias C. Rillig
- Jordi Sardans
- P. Nannipieri
- M. Estiarte
- Romà Ogaya
In Soil Science
- K. Treseder
- P. Nannipieri
- M. Bradford
- S. Allison
- N. Eisenhauer
- R. Bardgett
- Matthias C. Rillig
- S. Scheu
Citations in the corpus
- An Underground Revolution: Biodiversity and Soil Ecological Engineering for Agricultural Sustainability. (2016, background): “[39] showed that the functional capabilities of less-diverse soil communities were less resistant to stress compared with diverse communities, although, under no-stress conditions, few functional differences between communities were observed.”
- Soil biodiversity and carbon cycling: a review and synthesis of studies examining diversity–function relationships (2011, background): “…of greater than 10 species created gradients in diversity more often by applying several levels of disturbance to an intact soil community (e.g. Griffiths et al., 2000) or inoculating sterilized soil with serial dilutions of biota extracted from an intact soil community (e.g. Griffiths et al.,…”
- Integrating microbial ecology into ecosystem models: challenges and priorities (2012, background): “…nutrient transformation often increase linearly as the first several microbial taxa are added (Bell et al. 2005; Degens 1998; Fernandez et al. 2000; Griffiths et al. 2000; Naeem et al. 2000; Naeem and Li 1998; Setala and McLean 2004; van der Heijden et al. 1998; Violi et al. 2007; Wertz et al.…”
- Arbuscular mycorrhizae and terrestrial ecosystem processes (2004, background): “It is often difficult to empirically relate overall soil microbial community composition to function (e.g. Griffiths et al. 2000); this is perhaps in part due to relatively high ÔredundancyÕ in highly species-rich soil communities (Wardle 2002).”
- Interactions Between Bacteria, Protozoa and Nematodes in Soil (2012, methodology): “We used data from Ekelund et al. (2001) to calculate that three samples from a clay-loam soil (Griffiths et al. 2000) contained 0.3–12% interception feeders, 0.2–2% filter-feeders, 0.01–0.3% diffusion-feeders, 63–69% raptorial feeders, and 21–30% grasping feeders.”
- Using functional groups to investigate community response to environmental changes: two grassland case studies (2007, background): “5c; Griffiths et al., 2000; Hedlund et al., 2004).”
- Towards a Comparable Quantification of Resilience. (2018, neutral): “Category Attribute of recovery Refs Equation Referred to as Note #1 I Normalized system state [28,29,41] Px C0 Resilience Converges to 1 for full recovery #2 I Normalized system state [42] Px Cx Resilience Converges to 1 for full recovery #3 I Normalized system state [43] Cx Px Cx x100% Resilience E”
- Drought‐resistant fungi control soil organic matter decomposition and its response to temperature (2011, background): “, 2009) or the activity of the microflora (Degens, 1998; Griffiths et al., 2000), the relation between the diversity and the system function remains in question (Deacon, 1985; Rayner, 1994; Cox, 2001).”
- Insights into the resistance and resilience of the soil microbial community. (2013, background): “…resistance and resilience indices Resistance Resilience Reference D0 C0 Dx C0 Kaufman (1982) D0 C0 100 Dx C0 Sousa (1980) Cx CxDx 100 Cx Cx Dx 100 Griffiths et al. (2000) Dx Cx 1 100 NC Chaer et al. (2009) 1 2 C0 D0j j C0 þ C0 D0j j 2 C0 D0j j C0 D0j jþ Cx Dxj j 1 Orwin & Wardle (2004) Zx 0 f tð…”