An Architecture for Content Routing Support in the Internet

By Mark Gritter, David R. Cheriton. USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems, 2001

313 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Forwarding in a content-based network (2003, methodology): “Another work that uses similar terminology is that of Gitter and Cheriton [13].”
A Survey of Information-Centric Networking Research (2014, background): “A. DONA While many projects, starting with TRIAD [10], proposed extending the Internet with content routing capabilities (see Figure 1), the Data Oriented Network Architecture (DONA) [29] from UC Berkeley is one of the first complete ICN architectures, as it radically changes naming by replacing the”
A reality check for content centric networking (2011, background): “For example, CDNs ef.ciently tackle the content distribution problem by redirecting user requests for content located at a given host to a closeby data center.”
Named Data Networking (NDN) Project (2010, methodology): “These earlier efforts include the IP multicast routing design [22], the receiver-controlled reservation protocol RSVP [85], the Scalable Reliable Multicast design [35], the Adaptive Web Caching project [61], the design of Directed Diffusion [46], and the TRIAD project that also aimed to route conten”
A Survey of Caching Mechanisms in Information-Centric Networking (2015, background): “The history of ICN can be dated back to TRAID [3], [4].”
ROFL: routing on flat labels (2006, background): “The design in [18] does not use resolution, but cannot scale if many objects don’t follow the DNS hierarchy.”