Adversarial Examples on Object Recognition
By A. Serban, Erik Poll, Joost Visser. 2020
85 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Deep neural networks are at the forefront of machine learning research. However, despite achieving impressive performance on complex tasks, they can be very sensitive: Small perturbations of inputs can be sufficient to induce incorrect behavior. Such perturbations, called adversarial examples, are intentionally designed to test the network’s sensitivity to distribution drifts. Given their surprisingly small size, a wide body of literature conjectures on their existence and how this phenomenon can be mitigated. In this article, we discuss the impact of adversarial examples on security, safety, and robustness of neural networks. We start by introducing the hypotheses behind their existence, the methods used to construct or protect against them, and the capacity to transfer adversarial examples between different machine learning models. Altogether, the goal is to provide a comprehensive and self-contained survey of this growing field of research.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Lichao Sun
- Philip S. Yu
- Christin Seifert
- Meike Nauta
- Jesper C. Provoost
- Gillian Dobbie
- Annemarie Jutte
- Hongsheng Hu
In Signal Processing
- Philip S. Yu
- Christin Seifert
- Gillian Dobbie
- Meike Nauta
- Hongsheng Hu
- Zoran A. Salcic
- Xuyun Zhang
- Lichao Sun
Citations in the corpus
- This Looks Like That, Because ... Explaining Prototypes for Interpretable Image Recognition (2020, background): “Moreover, where humans are tolerant of moderate changes in object position, size, pose, contrast, illumination and clutter [14], deep image classification models might not be robust for such transformations [40, 44].”
- Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Survey (2021, background): “There are many surveys that summarize different attacks on ML models [35, 84, 114, 117, 137, 155, 166, 168, 176, 190, 228].”