Aerosol Effects on Simulated Storm Electrification and Precipitation in a Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics Model

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Review of Aerosol–Cloud Interactions: Mechanisms, Significance, and Challenges (2016, background): “Previous studies (G. Li et al. 2009; Mansell and Ziegler 2013) simulated the CCN effects on squall lines using CRMs with twomoment bulk cloud microphysics, and they found the aerosol invigoration effect on multicell storms in terms of a 13% increase in domainwide precipitation and a 40% enhancement ”
Secondary Ice Production: Current State of the Science and Recommendations for the Future (2016, unknown): “Several studies have assessed the inﬂuence of SIP on cloud electriﬁcation and lightning (e.g., Baker et al. 1995, 1999; Latham et al. 2004; Mansell et al. 2010; Mansell and Ziegler 2013).”
Lightning enhancement over major oceanic shipping lanes (2017, methodology): “Fulfillment of these requirements depends upon the thermodynamic structure of the troposphere as well as the microphysics of the cloud [Williams et al., 2002; Mansell and Ziegler, 2013; Stolz et al., 2015].”
Confronting the Challenge of Modeling Cloud and Precipitation Microphysics (2020, background): “…modulation of ice particle number concentration, SIP can impact precipitation formation, glaciation of mixed phase clouds, longevity of ice clouds, cloud electrification, and cloud radiative properties (e.g., Connolly et al., 2006; Field et al., 2017; Jensen et al., 2018; Mansell & Ziegler, 2013).”