GP-BayesFilters: Bayesian filtering using Gaussian process prediction and observation models
By Jonathan Ko, Dieter Fox. 2008
449 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Chelsea Finn
- Yoshua Bengio
- Trevor Darrell
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Mohit Bansal
- Kyunghyun Cho
In Signal Processing
- Yoshua Bengio
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Marc Peter Deisenroth
- Carl E. Rasmussen
- Wojciech Zaremba
- Jan Peters
- Kenji Fukumizu
- Pieter Abbeel
Citations in the corpus
- Neural Network Dynamics for Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning with Model-Free Fine-Tuning (2017, methodology): “However, the most efficient model-based algorithms have used relatively simple function approximators, such as Gaussian processes [6], [21], [22], time-varying linear models [5], [23], [24], and mixtures of Gaussians [25].”
- Algorithmic Framework for Model-based Deep Reinforcement Learning with Theoretical Guarantees (2018, methodology): “…2011b; Morimoto & Atkeson, 2003; Deisenroth et al., 2011) using dynamical models ranging from Gaussian process (Deisenroth & Rasmussen, 2011b; Ko & Fox, 2009), time-varying linear models (Levine & Koltun, 2013; Lioutikov et al., 2014; Levine & Abbeel, 2014; Yip & Camarillo, 2014), mixture of…”
- Deep Dynamics Models for Learning Dexterous Manipulation (2019, background): “Other work has focused on learning these models using high-capacity function approximators [17, 18, 3, 19, 20, 21, 22] and probabilistic dynamics models [23, 24, 25, 26].”
- Gaussian Processes for Data-Efficient Learning in Robotics and Control (2015, neutral): “matching [15], [44] and linearization of the posterior GP mean function [28].”
- Learning to Adapt in Dynamic, Real-World Environments through Meta-Reinforcement Learning (2018, methodology): “Prior model-based approaches tackled this problem by incorporating model uncertainty using Gaussian Processes (GPs) (Ko and Fox, 2009; Deisenroth and Rasmussen, 2011; Doerr et al., 2017).”
- Transfer from Simulation to Real World through Learning Deep Inverse Dynamics Model (2016, methodology): “Our approach is agnostic to how the policy πsource was obtained.”
- A Practical and Conceptual Framework for Learning in Control (2010, methodology): “In a practical application, if idealized transition dynamics are known, they can be used as a prior mean function as proposed for example by Ko et al. (2007) and Ko and Fox (2008, 2009a,b) in the context of RL and mechanical control.”
- Expectation Propagation in Gaussian Process Dynamical Systems (2012, methodology): “In about 20% of the test cases, the inference methods based on explicit linearization of the posterior mean function (GPEKS and EP-GPEKS) ran into numerical problems typical of linearizations [6], i.e., overconfident posterior distributions that caused numerical problems.”
- Probabilistic Recurrent State-Space Models (2018, methodology): “Gaussian Process State-Space Models (GP-SSMs) are a popular class of probabilistic SSMs (Wang et al., 2008; Ko & Fox, 2009; Turner et al., 2010; Frigola et al., 2013; 2014; Eleftheriadis et al., 2017).”
- Learning to Adapt: Meta-Learning for Model-Based Control (2018, background): “Model Learning: Many model-based approaches aim to learn a single global model, using function approximators such as Gaussian processes [20, 10] and neural networks [24, 43, 13].”
- Model learning for robot control: a survey (2011, background): “2007, 2008), and state estimation (Ko and Fox 2009).”
- Multi-modal estimation with kernel embeddings for learning motion models (2013, methodology): “The GP-BayesFilter particle filter use a standard sequential importance re-sampling (SIR) particle filter but learns the state transition and observation models from data using a set of Gaussian processes [19].”
- How to Construct Deep Recurrent Neural Networks (2013, background): “Ko and Dieter (2009) proposed deep transitions for Gaussian Process models.”
- Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Continuous State-Action Gaussian-POMDPs (2017, methodology): “Larger nonlinearities warrant the unscented Kalman filter (UKF) – a deterministic sampling technique to estimate moments – or particle methods [7, 12].”
- Toward fast policy search for learning legged locomotion (2012, methodology): “As an alternative to moment matching, approximations based on linearization are conceivable [11].”