Growth and renewable energy in Europe: A random effect model with evidence for neutrality hypothesis

754 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth relationship revisited: Evidence from G7 countries (2012, background): “For instance Payne (2011) proved the validity of the growth hypothesis; Apergis and Payne (2010c), Apergis and Payne (2010d), Apergis and Payne (2011a) proved the validity of the feedback hypothesis; and finally Menegaki (2011) proved the validity of the neutrality hypothesis.”
Renewable energy and growth: Evidence from heterogeneous panel of G7 countries using Granger causality (2015, background): “However, there are few efforts [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 14] that conclude the importance of renewable energy to economic growth in various countries.”
Renewable Energy and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Sign of Panel Long-Run Causality (2014, methodology): “Menegaki (2011), by employing a random effect model to cointegration and a panel error correction model framework on a group of 27 European countries, does not confirm any Granger causality direction between renewable energy and economic growth.”
Renewable energy, oil prices, and economic activity: A Granger-causality in quantiles analysis (2018, background): “Menegaki (2011) examined the causal relationship between economic growth and renewable energy for 27 European countries over the period 1997-2007; his results rejected causality between renewable energy consumption and GDP, although panel causality tests unfolded a short-run relation between…”