Spatial structure of harbour seal populations and the implications thereof

By T. Härkönen, K. Harding. 2001

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38a9eae6f66679628b54ac1e7fc1ebc71d4e8fa6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Jason Matthiopoulos
2. K. Harding
3. T. Härkönen
4. J. Harwood
5. L. Thomas
6. G. Pyke

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Harwood
2. Jason Matthiopoulos
3. L. Thomas

Citations in the corpus

• Metapopulation consequences of site fidelity for colonially breeding mammals and birds (2005, background): “The existence of significant genetic differences between breeding colonies suggests that the population dynamics of colonially breeding mammals and birds should be modelled using a metapopulation approach ( Harkonen & Harding 2001; Gaggiotti et al . 2002).”
• Mass-dependent energetics and survival in Harbour Seal pups (2005, background): “During subsequent years (1985‐2002) the animals were studied in a systematic programme examining age- and sex-specific haul-out behaviour (Harkonen et al . 1999; Harkonen & Harding 2001 ).”
• DECLINES IN HARBOR SEAL (PHOCA VITULINA) NUMBERS IN GLACIER BAY NATIONAL PARK, ALASKA, 1992–2002 (2006, background): “…seals remain within 50 km of their capture sites (Brown and Mate 1983, Thompson and Miller 1990, Tollit et al. 1998, Lowry et al. 2001), and genetic (Goodman 1998, Schaeff et al. 1999)5 and branding studies (Härkönen and Harding 2001) support strong adult female site fidelity for breeding areas.”