Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus
By Nirit Kadmon. 2001
181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/389f452f514c7daed405c4580ae3a90361b836f8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Ellie Pavlick
- Márta Abrusán
- David I. Beaver
- Chris Callison-Burch
- Bettina Braun
- David I. Brady Edward Stanton T. Florian Maria Wolters
- David Clark
- David Jaeger
Citations in the corpus
- Predicting the presuppositions of soft triggers (2011, background): “Such effects have been recently discussed in Beaver (2004) and Kadmon (2001).”
- When Semantics Meets Phonetics: Acoustical Studies of Second-Occurrence Focus (2007, background): “These include Vallduv́ı (1990), Rooth (1992), Dryer (1994), Roberts (1996), Büring (1997), Schwarzschild (1997), Williams (1997), Kadmon (2001), and Martı́ (2003), all of whom interpret second occurrence focus data as favoring strong accounts of association with focus phenomena over weak accounts.”
- The role of contrastive intonation contours in the retrieval of contextual alternatives (2010, background): “Accommodation is mainly discussed in the semantics and pragmatics literature and describes ‘the phenomenon of accommodating (inserting) something into the context that has not been explicitly mentioned’ (Kadmon, 2001, p. 174).”
- Most “babies” are “little” and most “problems” are “huge”: Compositional Entailment in Adjective-Nouns (2016, background): “People often draw conclusions based on “assump-tions that seem plausible, rather than assumptions that are known to be true” (Kadmon, 2001).”