Variable Selection for Portfolio Choice
By Yacine Aït-Sahalia, Michael W. Brandt. 2001
409 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3865e424bbfc1a9fea3f76da071dd512d38cab7c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Tim Bollerslev
- Torben G. Andersen
- Andrew J. Patton
- Allan G. Timmermann
- Guofu Zhou
- V. Todorov
- Michael W. Brandt
- Yacine Aït-Sahalia
In Finance
- Tim Bollerslev
- V. Todorov
- Torben G. Andersen
- Guofu Zhou
- Yacine Aït-Sahalia
- Andrew J. Patton
- D. Xiu
- Allan G. Timmermann
Citations in the corpus
- Economic Implications of Bull and Bear Regimes in UK Stock and Bond Returns (2005, neutral): “Ait-Sahalia and Brandt (2001) document a similar non-monotonic effect of the coefficient of risk aversion when predictability originates from a composite index of economic variables.”
- Asset Allocation Under Multivariate Regime Switching (2005, positive): “We also found slightly non-monotonic investment schedules for stocks under the VAR(1) model, which is not completely surprising.”
- Does the Failure of the Expectations Hypothesis Matter for Long-Term Investors (2005, positive): “We could examine the relative importance of these state variables, as in Ait-Sahalia and Brandt (2001).”
- On the Out-of-Sample Importance of Skewness and Asymmetric Dependence for Asset Allocation (2004, neutral): “By ensuring that our estimate always lies in the interval [0, 1] we employ a type of insanity Þlter which prevents the investor from taking an extreme position in the market.”
- Asymmetries in Stock Returns: Statistical Tests and Economic Evaluation (2007, positive): “(9)Although beyond the scope of this paper, the kinked utility function, used by Benartzi and Thaler (1995) and Aı̈t-Sahalia and Brandt (2001), seems another important class of preference for analyzing asymmetries.”
- Portfolio Choice Problems (2010, neutral): “These non-expected utility preferences have been applied to portfolio choice problems by Benartzi and Thaler (1995), Shefrin and Statman (2000), Aı̈t-Sahalia and Brandt (2001), Liu (2002b), Ang, Bekaert, and Liu (2003), and Gomes (2003), among others. Finally, there are numerous applications of more”
- Stochastic Partial Differential Equations and Portfolio Choice (2010, neutral): “The predictability of stock returns was rst discussed in [13], [14] and [16] (see also [1], [8], [42] and others).”
- VOLATILITY AND CORRELATION FORECASTING (2006, positive): “Campbell (1987, 2003), Shanken (1990), Aït-Sahalia and Brandt (2001), Harvey (2001), Lettau and Ludvigsson (2003) and Marquering and Verbeek (2004) find that interest rate spreads and financial ratios help predict volatility at longer horizons.”
- Dynamic Consumption and Portfolio Choice with Stochastic Volatility in Incomplete Markets (2005, positive): “However, Campbell (1987), Harvey (1989, 1991), Glosten, Jagannathan, and Runkle (1993), Aı̈t-Sahalia and Brandt (2001), and others have modeled time-varying expected returns and volatility jointly and found that the effects of state variables on expected returns are stronger than their effects on vo”
- Predictability of stock returns and asset allocation under structural breaks (2011, neutral): “Campbell (1987), Fama and French (1988), Kandel and Stambaugh (1996), Aït-Sahalia and Brandt (2001), Pesaran and Timmermann (1995). (2)See, e.”
- Optimal Portfolio Allocation under Higher Moments (2006, neutral): “Although a large number of tests have been proposed in the literature, we focus on three well-known procedures, that have proved to be relevant in similar contexts: (1) the statistic (JB) proposed by Jarque and Bera (1980) tests whether skewness and excess kurtosis are jointly zero, using the asympt”
- Investing in Mutual Funds when Returns are Predictable (2006, positive): “Nevertheless, for a wide variety of preferences, hedging demands are small, or even nonexistent, as demonstrated by Ait-Sahalia and Brandt (2001), among others. Indeed, in unreported tests, we have explicitly derived the hedging demands, following Fama’s (1996) intuition about Merton’s ICAPM.”
- Using Principal Component Analysis to Estimate a High Dimensional Factor Model with High-Frequency Data (2017, positive): “For example, Mykland and Zhang (2006) develop tools to conduct analysis of variance as well as univariate regression, while Todorov and Bollerslev (2010) add a jump component in the univariate regression setting and Aït-Sahalia et al. (2014) extend the factor model further to allow for multivariate ”
- Optimal Portfolio Choice with Parameter Uncertainty (2007, positive): “For example, it is of interest to ex tend our analysis to more complex dynamic portfolio choice problems, such as the setups of Barberis (2000) and Ait-Sahalia and Brandt (2001). In fact, economi cally better estimates can potentially be sought in many financial decisions, either in investments or i”
- On the Relationship between the Conditional Mean and Volatility of Stock Returns: A Latent VAR Approach (2004, positive): “(3)An alternative to estimating the two conditional moments separately and then relating the estimates is to infer directly the conditional mean-variance ratio from the first-order conditions (Euler equations) of a mean-variance investor’s portfolio choice (e.g., Brandt, 1999; Aı̈t-Sahalia and Brand”