Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

By Mark Vrabel. Oncology Nursing Forum, 2015

781 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Oncology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/384a167cc6671e42011043b5f27e80cb00a15a3e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Nancy A. Obuchowski
2. Jennifer A. Bullen

In Oncology

1. Nancy A. Obuchowski
2. Jennifer A. Bullen

In Statistics and Probability

1. Nancy A. Obuchowski
2. Jennifer A. Bullen
3. Abdulhamit Subasi
4. J. Cairney
5. D. Streiner

Citations in the corpus

• Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves: review of methods with applications in diagnostic medicine (2018, methodology): “Zhou et al (2011) reviewed many excellent statistical methods for meta-analyses, and there are evidence-based guidelines (i.e. PRISMA (Moher et al 2009)) for conducting and reporting meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy (Irwig et al 1994, Leeflang et al 2008, The Cochrane Collaboration 2013).”