A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency
By J. Hawkins. 1995
Subfields: Cognitive Science & Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Science & Psychology
- T. Griffiths
- Morten H. Christiansen
- Mieko Ueno
- J. Bobaljik
- Lars Hinrichs
- Geoffrey Leech
- Edward Gibson
- Jennifer Hay
Citations in the corpus
- Structure-to-Text Generation with Self-Training, Acceptability Classifiers and Context-Conditioning for the GEM Shared Task (2021, background): “Given the tendency to put heavier constituents towards the end of a sentence in English (Hawkins, 1994; Gibson, 2000; Temperley, 2007; Rajkumar et al., 2016), we additionally sorted siblings by increasing subtree depth, breaking ties by sorting alphabetically on predicate names.”
- Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change (2007, background): “…by information processing (cf. Givón 1976; Shibatani 1991), and that the cross-linguistic word order correlations described by Greenberg and others are motivated by competing pressures from syntactic parsing, information processing, and semantics (Hawkins 1994, 2004; see also Diessel 2001, 2005).”
- Innateness and culture in the evolution of language (2006, background): “Where do these universals come from? A great deal of research has proceeded under the assumption that this is essentially a biological question (3): that languages have the structure they do because of our innate faculty for acquiring (4) and processing (5) language.”
- Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. (2003, background): “Processing accounts have also been suggested to account for certain alternative word-order options [ 55 ,56].”
- Predicting the dative alternation (2007, background): “, Hawkins, 1994; Snyder, 2003). One such beautifully simple and appealing theory is that of Hawkins (1994). Discourse givenness correlates with shorter, less complex expressions, because less description is needed to identify a referent.”
- Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: a multivariate analysis of tagged corpora (2007, background): “end-weight principle is a case in point: while Hawkins (1994) proposes that the role of”
- An ERP study of the processing of subject and object relative clauses in Japanese (2008, methodology): “Following Ishizuka et al. (2003), dative-topic-marking was used on the head noun in order to control for potential confounds between RC type and both perspective shift (MacWhinney, 1982) and case-mismatch (Sauerland & Gibson, 1998).”