Marginal abatement costs of greenhouse gas emissions: A meta-analysis

By Onno Kuik, Luke Brander, Richard S. J. Tol. 2009

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this paper, we carry out a meta-analysis of recent studies into the costs of greenhouse gas mitigation policies that aim at the long-term stabilisation of these gases in the atmosphere. We find the cost estimates of the studies to be sensitive to the stringency of the stabilisation target, the assumed emissions baseline, the way in which the time profile of emissions is determined in the model, the choice of control variable (CO2 only versus multigas), the number of regions and energy sources in the model and, to a lesser degree, the scientific "forum" in which the study was developed. We find that marginal abatement costs of the stringent long-term targets that are currently considered by the European Commission are still very uncertain but might exceed the costs that have been suggested by recent policy assessments.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/383fa15a5cabb8b1e11be6696cf7ccc220502c4c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Richard S. J. Tol
  2. Massimo Tavoni
  3. Xiangzheng Deng
  4. Peixue Wang
  5. Shangkun Yu
  6. Huimin Zhou
  7. Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh
  8. Miklós Antal

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Massimo Tavoni
  2. Richard S. J. Tol
  3. Xiangzheng Deng
  4. Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh
  5. Miklós Antal
  6. David Anthoff
  7. Chris Hope
  8. Gary W. Yohe

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

  1. Richard S. J. Tol
  2. Massimo Tavoni
  3. Xiangzheng Deng
  4. Shangkun Yu
  5. Huimin Zhou
  6. Peixue Wang
  7. Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh
  8. Miklós Antal

Citations in the corpus