Brain activity, underlying mood and the environment: A systematic review
By M. Norwood, A. Lakhani, A. Maujean, H. Zeeman, Olivia Creux, Elizabeth A. Kendall. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2019
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract This review explores how different environments affect brain activity and associated mood response. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsychInfo and EMBASE were searched for peer-reviewed literature published prior to February 2019. 26 sources were included and divided into either a laboratory (n = 17) or naturalistic (n = 9) design. Most (n = 16) compared natural environments against urban/non-natural environments. Natural environments were associated with low frequency brainwaves and lower brain activity in frontal areas, indicating comfortable and subjectively restorative feelings. Urban environments appear to induce brain responses associated with negative affect (demonstrated in an overactive amygdala region). Furthermore, urban environments were associated with activation of the posterior cingulate cortex associated with top-down processing/effortful attention. A sensory accumulation effect is suggested, where the realism of an experimental condition, and therefore validity of participant responses, is greater when more senses are engaged. Longitudinal research is needed to determine whether chronic exposure to environments can promote change in brain behaviour.
Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Sensory Systems, Speech and Hearing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/383d8ee9d474ced52f358727eeb404fcc0282960
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
In Sensory Systems
In Speech and Hearing
Citations in the corpus
- The Role of Methodological Choices in the Effects of Experimental Exposure to Simulated Natural Landscapes on Human Health and Cognitive Performance: A Systematic Review (2020, background): “Relevant papers that could have provided further information about the use of simulations of natural landscapes were published when the present review was undergoing peer review (e.g., Appel et al., 2020; Browning et al., 2020; Chirico & Gaggioli, 2019; Gao et al., 2019; Hedblom et al., 2019; Litles”