Comparing molecular measures for detecting inbreeding depression
By J. Slate, Josephine M. Pemberton. 2002
190 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/383807f2aab571c39317b4db6a3b3acb539b8807
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Bengt Hansson
- Gordon Luikart
- N. Yoccoz
- Lars Westerberg
- A. Mysterud
- T. O'Brien
- M. Kinnaird
- Mevin B. Hooten
In Genetics
- Bengt Hansson
- Gordon Luikart
- N. Yoccoz
- Lars Westerberg
- Robin S. Waples
- A. Mysterud
- F. Allendorf
- R. Frankham
Citations in the corpus
- Inbreeding and runs of homozygosity: A possible solution to an old problem (2014, background): “The most frequent ones are (a) individual multilocus heterozygosity (MLH), which measures the proportion of heterozygous loci (Coulson et al., 1998; Slate and Pemberton, 2002); (b) mean d, defined as the squared difference in the numbers of repeat units between two alleles at a microsatellite locus,”
- On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations (2002, background): “For example, in the study by Slate & Pemberton (2002) on a Scottish red deer ( Cervus elaphus ) population, heterozygosity at as many as 71 polymorphic microsatellites was positively associated with birth weight 2472 B .”
- Genetic diversity-fitness correlation revealed by microsatellite analyses in European alpine marmots (Marmota marmota) (2006, background): “Recent studies have suggested that ideal conditions to reveal GDFC require hundred or thousands individuals and more than 10 loci (Slate and Pemberton 2002; Coltman and Slate 2003).”