Conservation laws of the Camassa–Holm equation

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Global Conservative Solutions of the Camassa–Holm Equation (2007, methodology): “for a.e. t. Here (1.3) is understood as an equality between functions in L 2 (IR).”
Global Conservative Solutions of the Camassa–Holm Equation—A Lagrangian Point of View (2007, background): “It has infinitely many conserved quantities, see, eg, Lenells ( 2005 ).”
The Hydrodynamical Relevance of the Camassa–Holm and Degasperis–Procesi Equations (2007, methodology): “Just like the KdV equation (see [15]) and the Camassa-Holm equation (see [24]), the Degasperis-Procesi equation has infinitely many integrals of motion.”
Global weak solutions and blow-up structure for the Degasperis–Procesi equation (2006, background): “It has a bi-Hamiltonian structure [25,32] and is completely integrable [3,8].”
Global Existence and Blow-Up Phenomena for the Degasperis-Procesi Equation (2006, background): “It has a bi-Hamiltonian structure [ 33 , 26] and is completely integrable [3, 9]. Its solitary waves are smooth if c0 > 0 and peaked in the limiting case c0 = 0 [4].”
GLOBAL DISSIPATIVE SOLUTIONS OF THE CAMASSA–HOLM EQUATION (2007, unknown): “to [18, 20].”
Inverse scattering transform for the Camassa–Holm equation (2006, unknown): “, such that [19, 24, 30, 40] −(∂ − ∂3)n δm = −(2ω∂ + m∂ + ∂m)n−1 δm .”