The (Super)Tree of Life: Procedures, Problems, and Prospects

By Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds, J. L. Gittleman, M. Steel. 2002

273 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38143bb212b17b99a39c2be7131148cf92d09acb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. Bui Quang Minh
2. Olga Chernomor
3. A. von Haeseler
4. H. Brinkmann
5. Laure Gallien
6. Hervé Philippe
7. G. Courtney
8. B. Wiegmann

In Molecular Biology

1. Bui Quang Minh
2. Olga Chernomor
3. A. von Haeseler
4. H. Brinkmann
5. Hervé Philippe
6. Frédéric Delsuc
7. G. Courtney
8. B. Wiegmann

In Paleontology

1. Bui Quang Minh
2. Olga Chernomor
3. A. von Haeseler
4. H. Brinkmann
5. G. Courtney
6. B. Wiegmann
7. J. Zrzavý
8. J. Skevington

Citations in the corpus

• Terrace Aware Data Structure for Phylogenomic Inference from Supermatrices (2016, methodology): “…phylogenetic information to resolve difficult branching orders (Bininda-Emonds et al. 1999; Phylogenomic inference methods are categorized into supertree and supermatrix methods (De Queiroz et al. 1995; Sanderson et al. 1998; Bininda-Emonds et al. 2002; Delsuc et al. 2005; Kupczok et al. 2010).”
• Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life (2005, methodology): “Alternatively, the supertree approach 37 combines the optimal trees obtained from the analysis of individual genes, each of which contains data from only partially overlapping sets of taxa.”
• Phylogeny of Recent Canidae (Mammalia, Carnivora): relative reliability and utility of morphological and molecular datasets (2004, methodology): “There is considerable discussion concerning the utility of this method (see Bininda-Emonds et al. 2002, who support it and e.g. Gatesy et al. 2002, who strongly reject it).”
• The phylogenetic relationships among infraorders and superfamilies of Diptera based on morphological evidence (2013, result): “A supertree approach (Bininda-Emonds et al., 2002) summarized nine phylogenetic hypotheses of the Diptera, all of which were based on morphological evidence (Yeates & Wiegmann, 2005), and produced results in agreement with previous studies at infraordinal level using non-quantitative methods (e.”
• Resolving Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: a quest for evidence (2010, background): “Supertrees can also be combined from several published phylogenies in order to produce the most up-to-date phylogenetic hypotheses (Bininda-Emonds et al., 2002).”