Structural Change and the Kaldor Facts in a Growth Model with Relative Price Effects and Non-Gorman Preferences
By T. Boppart. 2011
323 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38109f65f5299236bbc5d7da88c7212e2881b032
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Berthold Herrendorf
- Francisco J. Buera
- Richard Rogerson
- Joseph P. Kaboski
- L. R. Ngai
- Tomasz ëwiƒcki
- Á. Valentinyi
- Barbara Petrongolo
Citations in the corpus
- Structural Change With Long‐Run Income and Price Effects (2015, unknown): “Here we follow the extension proposed in Appendix B.3.3 (Boppart, 2014b) to account for three sectors such that there can be a hump-shape in manufacturing.”
- Fiscal policy during a pandemic (2020, background): “It is (3)Boppart (2014) and Carroll and Hur (2020) use different approaches and datasets to document that the share of expenditure in services and nontradable goods, respectively, is increasing in income.”
- Determinants of Structural Change (2013, methodology): “11Another indirect utility function which gives rise to non-vanishing income effect is used by Boppart (2014).”
- Growth and Structural Transformation (2013, background): “A recent paper by Boppart (2011) explores more general preferences that are consistent with balanced growth.”
- Gender Gaps and the Rise of the Service Economy (2017, background): “…of 5See Herrendorf, Rogerson and Valentinyi (2013b) for a recent survey, and references therein, including Acemoglu and Guerrieri (2008), Baumol (1967), Boppart (2011), Buera and Kobaski (2012), Caselli and Coleman (2001), Kongsamut et al (2001), Ngai and Pissarides (2007) and Rogerson (2008).”
- Skill-Biased Structural Change (2021, background): “Boppart (2014), Swiecki (2014) and Comin et al. (2015) all consider more general preferences with the common feature being that income effects associated with nonhomotheticities do not vanish asymptotically.”
- Automation and jobs: when technology boosts employment* (2019, unknown): “3 An exception is Boppart (2014). strongly elastic response; product demand grew faster than the decline in labor required per unit of output so that employment increased.”