The Red Queen and the Hard Reds: Productivity Growth in American Wheat, 1800-1940

By Alan Olmstead, Paul W. Rhode. 2002

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37eaa84c9a4275a08c4ac4ffb37e9856963889c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Philip G. Pardey
2. B. Babcock
3. J. Alston
4. K. Fuglie
5. Cheryl R. Doss

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. B. Babcock
2. Philip G. Pardey
3. J. Alston
4. K. Fuglie
5. Cheryl R. Doss

Citations in the corpus

• Barbed Wire: Property Rights and Agricultural Development (2010, unknown): “39Regarding technological change in agriculture, there are not obvious relative advances for low-woodland areas during the particular 1880 to 1900 period (Rasmussen 1962, Primack 1977, Olmstead and Rhode 2002).”
• The Shifting Patterns of Agricultural Production and Productivity Worldwide (2010, methodology): “Calculations Using Global Land-Use Data The base data are described by Ramankutty et al. (2008) and Ramankutty and Foley (1999) and were downloaded from the SAGE Web site (www.sage. wisc.edu) in May of 2009. The pixilated land-use data in the 2000 series from Ramankutty et al. are based on an underl”