The influence of thermal ecology on the distribution of three nymphalid butterflies

By S. Bryant, Christopher M Thomas, J. Bale. 2002

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37d9f8bc74bd9ac90189bc551e9a4afd92ba0713

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. R. Fox
2. Christopher M Thomas
3. H. Van Dyck
4. N. Wahlberg
5. A. Bourne
6. David Roy
7. B. Hawkins
8. Jane K. Hill

In Genetics

1. N. Wahlberg
2. A. Bourne
3. R. Fox
4. S. Nylin
5. R. Sutherst
6. M. Baguette
7. G. Maywald
8. Tom H. Oliver

In Insect Science

1. A. Bourne
2. G. Maywald
3. N. Wahlberg
4. S. Nylin
5. Tom H. Oliver
6. R. Fox
7. J. E. Byers
8. Jessica J. Hellmann

Citations in the corpus

• The effect of spatial resolution on projected responses to climate warming (2012, background): “Many species are associated with locally suitable microclimates at their range margins, where the coarser-scale mean climate is less suitable than at the centres of their ranges (Thomas et al., 1999; Bryant et al., 2002; Lennon et al., 2002; Stefanescu et al., 2004).”
• Including species interactions in risk assessments for global change (2007, background): “This appears to ignore radiant heating (Bryant et al., 2002) and its associated microclimatic effects on temperature and evaporation with slope and aspect at a landscape scale and shading at a plant scale.”
• Morphology versus molecules: resolution of the positions of Nymphalis, Polygonia, and related genera (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) (2003, methodology): “, 1992), effects of environment on distribution (Bryant et al., 2002), and insect physiology (Hiroyoshi and Mitsuhashi, 1999; Tanaka et al.”
• Water–energy balance and the geographic pattern of species richness of western Palearctic butterflies (2003, background): “…evidence that range limits of many European butterflies are set by climate and not the distribution of their foodplants (Dennis & Shreeve, 1991; Bryant et al., 1997, 2002; Quinn et al., 1998 Parmesan et al., 1999), and that butterfly richness patterns in Great Britain are well described by…”
• Microclimate Variability Significantly Affects the Composition, Abundance and Phenology of Butterfly Communities in a Highly Threatened Neotropical Dry Forest (2014, background): “Butterfly species may also prefer different microhabitats because of differing thermoregulatory requirements (Bryant et al. 2002). the close relationship of butterfly communities with microclimatic conditions and vegetation structure (which is directly related to climate) found in this study…”
• Impacts of climate warming and habitat loss on extinctions at species' low‐latitude range boundaries (2006, background): “…availability as measured by the ratio of actual and potential evapotranspiration (AET/PET; predominantly an index of larval host-plant quality) and (iv) total sunshine hours between 7 and 17 1C (PSUN; a measure of the potential for butterfly activity at low temperatures, Bryant et al., 2002).”
• Microclimatic buffering and resource‐based habitat in a glacial relict butterfly: significance for conservation under climate change (2009, background): “Secondly, caterpillars may adjust their body temperature by moving among substrates that differ in thermal profile (Sherman & Watt, 1973; Bryant et al., 2002).”
• Five Potential Consequences of Climate Change for Invasive Species (2008, background): “Successful biocontrol agents are highly specific to the invasive species they are targeted to control, and changes in climatic factors may alter these interspecific interactions (Bryant et al. 2002; Stireman et al. 2005; van Asch & Visser 2007).”
• Predicting insect phenology across space and time (2011, background): “…for different geographic areas, reflecting the variability of development conditions in the field relative to laboratory conditions, microclimate differences among sites and individuals, and the genetic differentiation of populations (Collier & Finch, 1985; Bryant et al., 2002; Trnka et al., 2007).”
• CANOPY STRUCTURE, MICROCLIMATE, AND HABITAT SELECTION BY A NOCTURNAL SNAKE, HOPLOCEPHALUS BUNGAROIDES (2003, unknown): “…on habitat selection by active diurnal ectotherms have confirmed the importance of habitat structure in creating opportunities for basking and other forms of behavioral thermoregulation (for recent examples, see Hertz et al. 1994, Vitt et al. 1997, Litzgus and Brooks 2000, Bryant et al. 2002).”
• Temperature-mediated habitat use and selection by a heat-sensitive northern ungulate (2012, background): “The importance of temperature on the ecology and behaviour of cold-blooded species (ectotherms) has long been recognized and is studied extensively (Campbell et al. 1974; Bryant et al. 2002; Hodgson et al. 2011).”