Observational Constraints on the Nature of Dark Energy: First Cosmological Results from the ESSENCE Supernova Survey

By W. M. Wood-Vasey, G. Miknaitis, C. Stubbs, S. Jha, A. Riess, P. Garnavich, R. Kirshner, C. Aguilera, A. Becker, J. Blackman and 27 more. 2007

838 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter, w = P/(ρc2), using 60 SNe Ia from the ESSENCE supernova survey. We derive a set of constraints on the nature of the dark energy assuming a flat universe. By including constraints on (ΩM, w) from baryon acoustic oscillations, we obtain a value for a static equation-of-state parameter w = -1.05 (stat 1 σ) ± 0.13 (sys) and ΩM = 0.274 (stat 1 σ) with a best-fit χ2/dof of 0.96. These results are consistent with those reported by the Supernova Legacy Survey from the first year of a similar program measuring supernova distances and redshifts. We evaluate sources of systematic error that afflict supernova observations and present Monte Carlo simulations that explore these effects. Currently, the largest systematic with the potential to affect our measurements is the treatment of extinction due to dust in the supernova host galaxies. Combining our set of ESSENCE SNe Ia with the first-results Supernova Legacy Survey SNe Ia, we obtain a joint constraint of w = -1.07 (stat 1 σ) ± 0.13 (sys), ΩM = 0.267 (stat 1 σ) with a best-fit χ2/dof of 0.91. The current global SN Ia data alone rule out empty (ΩM = 0), matter-only ΩM = 0.3, and ΩM = 1 universes at >4.5 σ. The current SN Ia data are fully consistent with a cosmological constant.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37cf5dc17c3e8fb51981325a27e0708ffb6be06a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Schneider
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. Simon D. M. White
  5. Daniel J. Eisenstein
  6. Volker Springel
  7. J. Brinkmann
  8. Andrey V. Kravtsov

Citations in the corpus