From the Internet of Things to the Web of Things: Resource-oriented Architecture and Best Practices
By Dominique Guinard, Vlad M. Trifa, Friedemann Mattern, Erik Wilde. Architecting the Internet of Things, 2011
537 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37afe9bf04a3582e20a879c162ba8e239d4de9cc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
Citations in the corpus
- The Internet of Things: A Survey from the Data-Centric Perspective (2013, unknown): “On the Web, the identification of resources relies on Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs), and representations retrieved through resource interactions contain links to other resources [46].”
- The Web of Things: A Survey (Invited Paper) (2011, background): “However, as indicated in [33], such a resource-oriented approach should not be universally considered as the miracle solution for every problem.”
- A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of internet of things technology (2014, unknown): “Guinard et al. (2011) described the IoT’s best practices based on the web technologies (e.”
- Understanding the Internet of Things: definition, potentials, and societal role of a fast evolving paradigm (2017, unknown): “This also brought IoT into a sort of generational leap to enter the Web of Things era [46], [47].”
- The Internet of Things—A survey of topics and trends (2014, background): “In particular, service oriented architectures (SOA) (Gronbaek 2008; James et al. 2009; Spiess et al. 2009) and the representational state transfer (REST) model (Castellani et al. 2010, 2011; Guinard et al. 2011) are frequently proposed for IoT use due to their focus on services and flexibility.”
- Internet of Things in Industries: A Survey (2014, background): “There is a trend for the move from IoT to a new vision named Web of Things that allows IoT objects to become active actors and peers on theWeb [74]–[77].”
- Internet of Things: An Overview (2017, background): “Generally, in such architecture a complex system is divided into subsystems that are loosely coupled and can be reused later (modular decomposability feature), hence providing an easy way to maintain the whole system by taking care of its individual components[22].”
- Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges (2012, background): “From a service-level perspective, the main issue relate to how to integrate (or: compose) the functionalities and/ or resources provided by smart objects (in many cases in forms of data streams generated) into services [15–17].”