Issues in information theory-based statistical inference—a commentary from a frequentist’s perspective
By Roger Mundry. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2010
132 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Small Animals
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37a01c8f7a261fb29d9b275bb9671dd6eb56b7ec
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Roger Mundry
- L. Garamszegi
- Matthew Symonds
- A. Moussalli
- F. Dechaume‐Moncharmont
- Mark A. F. Gillingham
- M. Galipaud
- Mark J. Whittingham
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- L. Garamszegi
- Roger Mundry
- F. Dechaume‐Moncharmont
- Mark A. F. Gillingham
- M. Galipaud
- Matthew Symonds
- A. Moussalli
- Shinichi Nakagawa
In Small Animals
- L. Garamszegi
- Matthew Symonds
- A. Moussalli
- David Hodgson
- Maria Eugenia Correa-Cano
- Beth S Robinson
- Richard Inger
- Lynda Donaldson
Citations in the corpus
- Statistical Issues and Assumptions of Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares (2014, background): “However, it must be clearly stated that model selection and significance testing are two approaches to statistical inference that are not conformable (e.g., Burnham and Anderson 2002; Mundry 2011), and once model selection has been applied, significance tests are meaningless.”
- Using information theory as a substitute for stepwise regression in ecology and behavior (2010, unknown): “Other papers discuss philosophical and practical issues that create a wide gap between IT and NHT-stepwise methods (Burnham et al. 2010; Mundry 2010) or emphasize one concrete weakness of NHT-stepwise methods (Forstmeier and Schielzeth 2010).”
- A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion (2010, background): “Mundry (2010) and Burnham et al. (2010) provide discussion of the philosophical and inferential differences between the NHST approach and IT-AIC approach.”
- A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology (2018, methodology): “For example, in controlled experimental studies a researcher may wish to test the effect of a limited number of treatments and support estimates of effect sizes with statements of statistical significance using model simplification (Mundry 2011).”
- Model selection and model averaging in behavioural ecology: the utility of the IT-AIC framework (2010, background): “For simple analyses, the benefits are largely philosophical, and operational differences are likely to be slight (see also Mundry 2010 ).”
- Information-theoretic approaches to statistical analysis in behavioural ecology: an introduction (2010, methodology): “In other words, NHT and IT approaches differ with regard to how inference is drawn, but not with regard to computation and model fitting (Mundry 2010).”
- Ecologists overestimate the importance of predictor variables in model averaging: a plea for cautious interpretations (2014, background): “In the same way that a p-value is not a measure of effect size (Nakagawa & Cuthill 2007, Mundry 2011), large SW should certainly not be interpreted as denoting large effects.”