Stems and Paradigms

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes on lexical recognition: Evidence from Serbian (2009, background): “…long held a prominent role in the study of language as one of the fundamental building blocks of the lexicon (cf., Anderson, 1992; Aronoff, 1994; Blevins, 2003; De Saussure, 1966/1916; Kury lowicz, 1964; Wunderlich & Fabri, 1995; Zwicky, 1985, but for linguistic views that reject the relevance…”
An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. (2011, methodology): “The model therefore dovetails well with theories in linguistic morphology which have challenged the explanatory value of the theoretical construct of the morpheme (see, e.g., Matthews, 1974; Aronoff, 1994; S. Anderson, 1992; Stump, 2001; Blevins, 2003, 2006; Booij, 2010).”
Joint predictiveness in inflectional paradigms (2016, background): “…enthusiasm over the study of stem allomorphy, which very often took the form of families of implicative statements over stem alternants (see among others Maiden (1992); Aronoff (1994); Brown (1998); Hippisley (1998); Bonami & Boyé (2002); Blevins (2003), and the papers collected in Bonami (2012)).”